Tehran's Nukes

At last week's Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings titled, "Engaging Iran: Obstacles and Opportunities," former Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns told senators that "there is no question [Iran is] seeking a nuclear weapons capability. No one doubts that." No one? Really? Actually, our own spy agencies belittle the Iranian threat.

On March 12, the CIA's Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation and Arms Control Center, known as WINPAC, released its report to Congress on the Acquisition of Technology Relating to Weapons of Mass Destruction and Advanced Conventional Munitions, which covered 2008. The agency concluded that "we do not know whether Iran currently intends to develop a nuclear weapon." However, Iran "continued to expand its nuclear infrastructure and continued uranium enrichment activities ... despite multiple United Nations Security Council Resolutions since 2006 calling for the suspension of those activities."

The report essentially reworks conclusions reached in a controversial December 2007 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iranian Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities, which Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called a "declaration of surrender" by America.

The intelligence community then reported that it judged "with high confidence" that Iran halted its weapons program in 2003 for "at least several years." Headlines declared that Iran had no weapons program - but the 2007 NIE admitted that the United States did "not know whether [Iran] currently intends to develop nuclear weapons" and that "Tehran at a minimum is keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons."

The new WINPAC report discusses some aspects of Iran's nuclear infrastructure, such as increased uranium enrichment activities at the nuclear facility at Natanz, the arrival of Russian-supplied fuel for the new reactor at Bushehr, and continued construction on a new heavy water research reactor. Most of the information cited in the unclassified assessment is available in other, more detailed reports by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Had any facilities like these been located in Iraq after the invasion in 2003, it would have justified weapons of mass destruction as a casus belli.

New York District Attorney Robert Morgenthau, who also testified at last week's Senate hearing, said the message from Iran was "loud and clear." His investigations of the multibillion-dollar criminal financial schemes Iran is using to finance its programs indicated "it is late in this game and we don't have a lot of time to stop Iran" from developing nuclear weapons and the missiles to deliver them. "The Iranians are deadly serious about proceeding with this program," he said. "It is later than a lot of people think."

Just how late is it? Last February, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that Iran already had sufficient raw materials to build a nuclear weapon and noted that the "continued lack of cooperation by Iran ... gives rise to concerns about possible military dimensions of Iran's nuclear program." The center-left Institute for Science and International Security reported in December 2008 that Iran "is expected to reach [the nuclear-capability] milestone during 2009 under a wide variety of scenarios." Even the 2007 NIE indicated Iran could have weapons capability by next year.

A Senate report on Iran is due out this week, and we look forward to reading its conclusions about the threat posed by the Iranian nuclear weapons program. Maybe the intelligence community eventually will conclude that it exists - hopefully sometime before Iran tests a nuclear weapon.

CommentsRead 0 CommentsPlease login or register to post a comment function yedda_render_widget(url) { var ct=''; var temp = document.getElementsByTagName('title'); if (temp!=null && temp.length>0) {ct=temp[0].text;} document.write(''); } yedda_render_widget("http://yedda.com/api/widgets/?d=517&mt=4&mt.qht=EDITORIAL: Tehran's nukes"); Got a question? Ask on Yedda! document.getElementById('yeddaAskBox').setAttribute('target','_blank')

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

AdvertisementTop StoriesMost ReadCheney: Obama endangers the nationSeries of gaffes led to Air Force One flyoverColbert namesake for Venezuelan beetleBARTON: Sending us back to 1875Obama reverses stance on immigrationStars shine at correspondents' dinner EDITORIAL: Nepal's Maoist double-crossEXCLUSIVE: Secret U.S.-Israel nuclear accord in jeopardyPRUDEN: Borking machine gets early tuneupAnti-tax crusade to storm CapitolMost SharedCheney: Obama endangers the nationAnti-tax crusade to storm CapitolObama reverses stance on immigrationBARTON: Sending us back to 1875Speed camera repeal effort an easy sellNORTH: The Gitmo quagmireEDITORIAL: Budget-cut baloneyChoosing not to abort babies with disabilitiesEXCLUSIVE: Secret U.S.-Israel nuclear accord in jeopardyPRUDEN: Borking machine gets early tuneupMost CommentedNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneHeadlines

NEWS

Sykes' WH dinner wit questioned

NEWS

Cheney: Limbaugh more loyal than Powell

OPINION

EDITORIAL: Arming sailors

SPORTS

Caps at their best in worst spot

NEWS

GREEN & GLOVER: Getting started

NEWS

Taliban a threat to Pakistan's 'existence'

OPINION

SEARS: In honor of Ed Meese

SPORTS

Thom Loverro: In this rivalry, defeats become more personalVideos

PollPresident Obama called for overturning a ban on publicly funded abortions in Washington, D.C., as part of his budget proposal, but did not overturn the national ban on federal funding. Do you agree with him?YesNoUndecidedOther SetC2LVisibility('WashingtonTimes','WashingtonTimes','news_2009_may_11_tehrans-nukes','C2LContainer','C2LContainer2'); Advertising LinksTWT Storee-editionPrint EditionWeekly Washington TimesTWT AffiliatesMiddle East TimesGolfUPIArbor BallroomWashington Times GlobalAbout TWTPress RoomF.A.Q.Work for TWTAdvertiseSponsorsContact UsPrivacy PolicySite Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.

// Tacoda Audience Network var tcdacmd="dt"; var tcdasource='"; document.write(tcdasource); var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try{ var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3328123-2"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

AdvertisementTop StoriesMost ReadCheney: Obama endangers the nationSeries of gaffes led to Air Force One flyoverColbert namesake for Venezuelan beetleBARTON: Sending us back to 1875Obama reverses stance on immigrationStars shine at correspondents' dinner EDITORIAL: Nepal's Maoist double-crossEXCLUSIVE: Secret U.S.-Israel nuclear accord in jeopardyPRUDEN: Borking machine gets early tuneupAnti-tax crusade to storm CapitolMost SharedCheney: Obama endangers the nationAnti-tax crusade to storm CapitolObama reverses stance on immigrationBARTON: Sending us back to 1875Speed camera repeal effort an easy sellNORTH: The Gitmo quagmireEDITORIAL: Budget-cut baloneyChoosing not to abort babies with disabilitiesEXCLUSIVE: Secret U.S.-Israel nuclear accord in jeopardyPRUDEN: Borking machine gets early tuneupMost CommentedNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneHeadlines

NEWS

Sykes' WH dinner wit questioned

NEWS

Cheney: Limbaugh more loyal than Powell

OPINION

EDITORIAL: Arming sailors

SPORTS

Caps at their best in worst spot

NEWS

GREEN & GLOVER: Getting started

NEWS

Taliban a threat to Pakistan's 'existence'

OPINION

SEARS: In honor of Ed Meese

SPORTS

Thom Loverro: In this rivalry, defeats become more personalVideos

PollPresident Obama called for overturning a ban on publicly funded abortions in Washington, D.C., as part of his budget proposal, but did not overturn the national ban on federal funding. Do you agree with him?YesNoUndecidedOther SetC2LVisibility('WashingtonTimes','WashingtonTimes','news_2009_may_11_tehrans-nukes','C2LContainer','C2LContainer2'); Advertising LinksTWT Storee-editionPrint EditionWeekly Washington TimesTWT AffiliatesMiddle East TimesGolfUPIArbor BallroomWashington Times GlobalAbout TWTPress RoomF.A.Q.Work for TWTAdvertiseSponsorsContact UsPrivacy PolicySite Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.

// Tacoda Audience Network var tcdacmd="dt"; var tcdasource='"; document.write(tcdasource); var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try{ var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3328123-2"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}

NEWS

NEWS

OPINION

SPORTS

NEWS

NEWS

OPINION

SPORTS

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.

Read Full Article »
Comment
Show commentsHide Comments

Related Articles