A Win for the Honduran People

Welcome

Home This week's print edition Daily news analysis Opinion All opinion Leaders Letters to the Editor Blogs Columns KAL's cartoons Correspondent's diary Economist debates World politics All world politics Politics this week International United States The Americas Asia Middle East and Africa Europe Britain Special reports Business and finance About our new page All business and finance Business this week Economics focus Management Economics A-Z Business education All business education Which MBA? Markets and data All markets and data Daily chart Weekly indicators World markets Currencies Rankings Big Mac index Science and technology About our new page All science and technology Technology Quarterly Technology Monitor Books and arts All books and arts Style guide People People Obituaries Diversions Audio and video Audio and video library Audio edition The World In The World in 2009 The World in 2008 The World in 2007 The World in 2006 The World in 2005 The World in 2004 Research tools All research tools Articles by subject Economics A-Z Special reports Style guide Country briefings All country briefings China India Brazil United States Russia My account home Newsletters and alerts Manage my newsletters Manage my e-mail alerts Manage my RSS feeds Manage special-offer alerts More » Print subscriptions Subscribe to The Economist Renew my subscription Change my print subscription delivery, billing or e-mail address Pay my bill Activate premium online access Report a missing copy Suspend my subscription More » Digital subscriptions Subscribe to Economist.com Manage my subscription Mobile edition Audio edition Download screensaver More » Classifieds and jobs The Economist Group About the Economist Group Economist Intelligence Unit Economist Conferences Intelligent Life CFO Roll Call European Voice EuroFinance Reprints and permissions EIU online store Economist shop

Advertisement

document.write(''); document.write(''); Latin America function toggle(embed){ if(document.getElementById(embed).style.display == 'none'){ document.getElementById(embed).style.display = 'block'; }else{ document.getElementById(embed).style.display = 'none'; } }

Honduras

Back in his old hat?

Oct 31st 2009 | MEXICO CITYFrom Economist.com

A deal brings hope of an end to the political crisis in Honduras AP

FOUR months after Manuel Zelaya was hauled out of bed at gunpoint, flown to Costa Rica in a military plane, and replaced by Roberto Micheletti as president of Honduras, negotiators for the two sides have reached an agreement to put an end to the country’s political crisis. On Thursday October 29th, representatives of both the deposed and de facto presidents declared they would ask the Congress—which voted to name Mr Micheletti president after Mr Zelaya was exiled—to hold a new vote on whether to reinstate him for the remaining three months of his term. They pledged to abide by the result.

The deal was hailed for its importance in the consolidation of democracy in the region. There is no doubt that the agreement represents a significant victory for foreign leaders, and particularly for Barack Obama, whose decision to send a high-level diplomatic mission to Honduras two days earlier provided the decisive push to conclude the talks. It establishes both a path for a possible return to office for Mr Zelaya and stops him from calling a constituent assembly, a body with the job of rewriting the constitution. His opponents say this would have enabled him to eliminate the country’s ban on presidential re-election.

document.write('');

With Mr Zelaya’s approval of the deal, the rest of the world will be able to recognise the presidential elections set for November 29th, and to begin restoring the diplomatic relations and financial assistance that were cut off after the coup. But it is far less clear whether the pact will truly end the crisis or whether it simply shifts the venue for addressing it from the negotiating table to the the legislature.

Mr Zelaya’s supporters are convinced that the arrangement paves the way for his restoration to power in a matter of days. Although the deal does not set a date for a congressional vote or prejudge its outcome, the deposed president’s camp says their leader would not have accepted the proposal if he had not had strong informal assurances that he would be returned to office promptly.

Yet such confidence seems somewhat misplaced. Because Mr

Advertisement

Honduras

Oct 31st 2009 | MEXICO CITYFrom Economist.com

FOUR months after Manuel Zelaya was hauled out of bed at gunpoint, flown to Costa Rica in a military plane, and replaced by Roberto Micheletti as president of Honduras, negotiators for the two sides have reached an agreement to put an end to the country’s political crisis. On Thursday October 29th, representatives of both the deposed and de facto presidents declared they would ask the Congress—which voted to name Mr Micheletti president after Mr Zelaya was exiled—to hold a new vote on whether to reinstate him for the remaining three months of his term. They pledged to abide by the result.

The deal was hailed for its importance in the consolidation of democracy in the region. There is no doubt that the agreement represents a significant victory for foreign leaders, and particularly for Barack Obama, whose decision to send a high-level diplomatic mission to Honduras two days earlier provided the decisive push to conclude the talks. It establishes both a path for a possible return to office for Mr Zelaya and stops him from calling a constituent assembly, a body with the job of rewriting the constitution. His opponents say this would have enabled him to eliminate the country’s ban on presidential re-election.

With Mr Zelaya’s approval of the deal, the rest of the world will be able to recognise the presidential elections set for November 29th, and to begin restoring the diplomatic relations and financial assistance that were cut off after the coup. But it is far less clear whether the pact will truly end the crisis or whether it simply shifts the venue for addressing it from the negotiating table to the the legislature.

Mr Zelaya’s supporters are convinced that the arrangement paves the way for his restoration to power in a matter of days. Although the deal does not set a date for a congressional vote or prejudge its outcome, the deposed president’s camp says their leader would not have accepted the proposal if he had not had strong informal assurances that he would be returned to office promptly.

Yet such confidence seems somewhat misplaced. Because Mr Zelaya’s Liberal Party is split over the coup—at least a third of its members are vehemently opposed to his reinstatement—he will need the votes of the rival National Party to obtain a majority. And the Nationals, whose presidential candidate, Porfirio Lobo Sosa, holds a comfortable lead in the polls, would be hard-pressed to vote to restore Mr Zelaya, since their supporters loathe him and they benefit from the Liberals’ split.

One leading National politician says the party will probably try to delay a vote on Mr Zelaya’s future until after the presidential election. It is unclear whether such a strategy would be seen as an act of bad faith that undermines the agreement, since the Nationals were not part of the discussions.

Moreover, Mr Zelaya’s legal status is yet to be determined. Since both sides agreed not to include an amnesty for political crimes in the deal, the deposed president technically remains a fugitive, facing 18 different charges. He is still safe as a guest at the Brazilian embassy, where he holed up after sneaking into the country a month ago. But he could be arrested the minute he ventures outside. Having insisted for months that Mr Zelaya should be detained and tried as soon as he steps on Honduran soil, the de facto government and the courts will probably have to offer him an amnesty of their own—or at least a delayed prosecution—if they want to retain the support of the rest of the world.

Even if the agreement does not provide a definitive answer to Honduras’s political divisions, it should get foreign aid flowing again soon—a critical development for a poor country dependent on external assistance. In that sense, it is a victory for the Honduran people, regardless of whom they call their president for the next three months.

Back to top ^^

The Economist welcomes your views.

Advertisement

Advertisement

NUS Asia-Pacific EMBA Ranked Top 20 EMBA Worldwide (FT Ranking 2008) Admission Requirements: Bachelor degree 10 years working experience Apply now for June 2010 Intake. Join us at info sessions that we conduct globally

Call for Research Fellows from around the world to work at the IN3 (Internet Interdisciplinary Institute) of the Open University of Catalonia (UOC) in Barcelona.

United Nations University—Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS) Vice Rector in Europe/Director, UNU-EHS based at Bonn, Germany Apply by 15 November 2009

CALL FOR PAPERS Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra CENTRUM Business School

Amidst a dramatic tropical landscape, a vibrant Caribbean port of call is emerging. Be amongst the first to discover Christophe Harbour, St. Kitts.

Glasgow Caledonian UniversityYunus Chair in Social Business and Health For full details, please visit our dedicated website

Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2009. All rights reserved.

Read Full Article »