July 29, 2010

A Government for Baghdad

Kenneth Pollack, National Interest

AP Photo

It’s been over four months since Iraq’s national elections on March 7 and still there is no sign that the various parties are enough in agreement to form a new government. Given the fragility of Iraq’s nascent democracy, and the importance of this particular transition—which will set precedents for decades to come—the United States and the Iraqis have good reason to be patient. If we want a government bad, we can get one bad, but that won’t serve anyone’s interests.

Unfortunately, there are also dangers in allowing this process to drag on. The Iraqi people have suffered for too long and they desperately need a government able to administer the country, rebuild its infrastructure and economy, and forge political compromises...

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Iraq

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

May 16, 2012
The Risks of a Syria Spillover
Andrew Exum, World Politics Review
Over the past week, we have seen the first real case of sectarian violence spilling over from Syria into neighboring Lebanon. In clashes in and around the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli, at least five people have been killed... more ››
May 17, 2012
A Pundit's Rosy View of the Pax Americana
Andrew Bacevich, Harper's
Time and again - from the collapse of the Soviet Union to the events of 9/11 to the onset of the Arab Spring - events have caught the experts, whether in government or on the outside, completely by surprise. Business owners... more ››
May 13, 2012
Prolonging the Tyrant Tax in Iraq
George Jonas, National Post
Saddam was pulled from his hole in the ground on Dec. 13, 2003. The coalition's human cost was about 600 lives. President Bush could have declared victory and sailed home the next day. Instead, he had America spend another... more ››