COYNE: Call it the ‘bottom of the boat’ test
Jonathan Hayward/CP
For all the breathless coverage it has attracted, it's still unclear just what the issue is in the matter of the boatload of Tamils that arrived off the coast of B.C. last week.
For starters, there is very little that anyone can do about it, or would, beyond what is being done already. No one is suggesting we should have turned the boat back on the high seas, or expelled the Tamils without hearing their refugee claims; both options are in any case illegal. Neither is anyone proposing that they should be admitted to our soil without a proper vetting, to ensure at a minimum that no terrorists lurk amongst them.
For all its tough talk about "sending a message" to any "criminals" out there who might be thinking of organizing other such excursions, the Harper government has in fact been handling the situation with admirable humanity, winning praise from, among others, the United Nations Human Rights Commission.
The Tamils have been well looked after, their ailments treated, their claims heard promptly. The system, in other words, is working.
So why all the fuss? There's a suspicion that the organizers may be Tamil Tigers, the notorious terrorist group. The Tigers themselves are a despicable bunch, but helping hundreds of desperate people to reach freedom would seem the least of their crimes. Sometimes this is called "human smuggling" or "trafficking," to give it an unseemly taint. But smuggling implies an attempt to evade detection: this ship, by contrast, went about its business openly. And while trafficking in human beings is obviously horrific when the "cargo" is destined for slavery, in this case the destination is Canada. However unpleasant their conditions may have been aboard ship, the $50,000 each of the Tamils reportedly paid for their passage is surely a bargain, if it means a chance to live in Canada.
Is that the problem, then: are the Tamils, as it is said, "jumping the queue"? But there is no queue for refugee claimants. Of the 40,000-odd refugee claims Canada receives every year, about a quarter are made from Canada (as opposed to being made at embassies or refugee camps overseas). You show up with a valid claim, you're in: doesn't matter how many people arrive ahead of or behind you. The Prime Minister complains that the Tamils did not go through "normal channels," but in fact it's a completely normal channel: the only difference is they arrived by boat, rather than by plane.
Some are concerned that this might be the first (well, the second: the first arrived last October) of many similar deliveries. The same dire warning was issued when a boatload of Sikhs arrived off the coast of Nova Scotia in 1987. Never happened. Apart from a few Chinese boats the following decade, that's been about it for amphibian invasions.
Doesn't mean it won't happen this time. And this would be a problem because"."."."why? If their claims are genuine, we should be happy to admit them. A few thousand more refugees is not going to overwhelm us.
Of course, I have no way of knowing if the Tamils' claims are genuine: post-civil war Sri Lanka is by all accounts an unpleasant place for them, but not perhaps lethal. And admittedly, the current process for detecting and expelling false refugee claimants is a tortuous one. So I propose a simpler, streamlined test.
Instead of holding lengthy hearings at great cost to detect whether a claimant is seeking entry by virtue of a "well-founded fear of persecution," and not for some other reason, I suggest the question should be: have you just spent four months in the bottom of a boat to get here?
Perhaps it will be decided that the Tamils are mere economic migrants. Many people are very exercised about this, preferring that economic class immigrants go through the battery of tests the Immigration Department has devised to predict which of them will flourish most in Canada's economy. Very well. I have a simple test for this, too. Here it is: have you just spent four months in the bottom of a boat to get here?
Whatever it is the Tamils are trying to get away from, whether persecution or privation, it's got to be horrible enough to make the prospect of four months in steerage with a litre of water a week to drink worth bearing. And while Immigration-style points tests may be good at assessing certain types of skills (or not: for all the alleged sophistication of the tests, the "quality" of immigrants has apparently been declining in recent years), economic success is as much about character and determination as anything else"”the kind of determination that would move a person to sit in a darkened hold eating spiders for four months, just for a chance to better their lot. If that's queue-jumping, fine: these are the sort of people we want.
Remember the Vietnamese boat people of the 1970s? We let in 60,000 of them in the space of a couple of years. Most were farmers, fishermen and labourers, with little in the way of conventional skills. A decade later they were outperforming the native-born population on any number of indicators, with an unemployment rate a third lower than the norm.
I don't think anybody can really say why a given person might have chosen to leave the country of his birth. Countries that repress their populations also tend to be economic backwaters, and it stands to reason people's motives might be mixed. Perhaps we needn't bother trying to separate them: the bottom-of-a-boat test works either way. Tags: british columbia, human smuggling, refugees, Tamil, Tamil Tigers, trafficking, United Nations Human Rights Commission Print Comment var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};
PreviousA know-nothing strain of conservatism
14310083 Responseshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F2010%2F08%2F20%2Fcall-it-the-bottom-of-the-boat-test%2FPeople+willing+to+endure+what+the+Tamils+did+are+just+the+kind+we+want+2010-08-20+10%3A00%3A21Andrew+Coynehttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F%3Fp%3D143100 to “People willing to endure what the Tamils did are just the kind we want”« Older Comments
RagingRanter says: Aug 20, 2010 at 12:19 pm Report AbuseIf we had a border along Mexico would you let all of the millions of "refugees" in?
If we shared a border with Mexico, we wouldn't have a choice. For an example, see United States of America.
Reply NiceGuy says: Aug 20, 2010 at 12:30 pm Report AbuseWhy bother then with an Immigration or Refugee system at all then? Just let anyone float up and stake their claim…collect their welfare and expensive medical treatment.
Sounds like a beer commercial…I have a raft, I am Canadian!
Reply Mark R says: Aug 20, 2010 at 1:13 pm Report AbuseStep further. Why wait. Let's go out and start looking for people to migrate here.
Reply Guest says: Aug 20, 2010 at 1:08 pm Report AbuseGood to see some rational commentary on this, congratulations to Andrew Coyne for a thoughtful piece. The usual overheated bluster is restricted to (some of) the comments.
Reply« Older Comments
adUtility.insertAd("bigbox", { type: adUtility._AD_BIGBOX_COMPANION }); Join the DiscussionBy posting your comment you agree to the Macleans.ca terms of service and privacy policy.
To add an avatar to your comment, please visit gravatar.com and register the email you use to comment on this site.
Comment
Click here to cancel reply.Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
Send me site updates
/* Loading IntenseDebate Comments..."; idc_ns.parentNode.insertBefore(idc_ld, idc_ns); setTimeout( IDC_revert, 10000 ); /* ]]> */ /* */ adUtility.insertAd("bigbox", { type: adUtility._AD_BIGBOX_COMPANION }); GA_googleFillSlot("MME_ROS_Flyout"); Most Read Most Recent Comments There's no such thing as a "cougar" - 40 CommentsOutraged moms, trashy daughters - 287 CommentsA know-nothing strain of conservatism - 482 CommentsWhat a season of sexual harassment suits says about the modern office - 2 CommentsThe controversy behind a remote town's stimulus project - 36 Comments If the people do not support you loudly enough, create your own people Friday, August 20, 2010 12:35 - 1435955 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F2010%2F08%2F20%2Fif-the-people-do-not-support-you-loudly-enough-create-your-own-people%2FIf+the+people+do+not+support+you+loudly+enough%2C+create+your+own+people2010-08-20+16%3A35%3A08Aaron+Wherryhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F%3Fp%3D143595 Inflation rate rises due to HST Friday, August 20, 2010 12:29 - 1436510 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F2010%2F08%2F20%2Finflation-rate-rises-due-to-hst%2FInflation+rate+rises+due+to+HST2010-08-20+16%3A29%3A35macleans.cahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F%3Fp%3D143651 Tories groom the rank-and-file at right-wing boot camp Friday, August 20, 2010 12:03 - 1436383 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F2010%2F08%2F20%2Ftories-groom-the-rank-and-file-at-right-wing-boot-camp%2FTories+groom+the+rank-and-file+at+right-wing+boot+camp2010-08-20+16%3A03%3A52macleans.cahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F%3Fp%3D143638 North Korea creates Facebook account Friday, August 20, 2010 11:58 - 1436360 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F2010%2F08%2F20%2Fnorth-korea-creates-facebook-account%2FNorth+Korea+creates+Facebook+account+2010-08-20+15%3A58%3A56macleans.cahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F%3Fp%3D143636 chester good on Ignatieff's summer of loveMcC_ on If the people do not support you loudly enough, create your own peoples_c_f on The arctic: Au nord, peu de nouveauMostlyCivil on Hard to get (II)TayRodney on Mailbag: Stephen Harper, interstellar intercourse, the Old Spice Guy View This Pollonline surveys 14300781 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F2010%2F08%2F17%2Fwhat-do-you-think-of-the-government%25e2%2580%2599s-handling-of-tamil-asylum-seekers-in-b-c%2FWhat+do+you+think+of+the+government%E2%80%99s+handling+of+Tamil+asylum-seekers+in+B.C.%3F2010-08-17+21%3A09%3A15macleans.cahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww2.macleans.ca%2F%3Fp%3D143007 Twitter Facebook RSS Mobile Podcasts function sendEmail(){ var theEmail = document.getElementById("email1").value; top.location.href="/newsletter/?email="+theEmail; } Maclean's Weekly Newsletter Subscribe now for free Need to WatchDid Roger Federer really knock a bottle off that man’s head with a tennis serve?
Click here to watch
1 Canada Inflation rate rises due to HSTPrice increases still smaller than analysts’ expectations
2 Canada Tories groom the rank-and-file at right-wing boot campOne speaker encourages "Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil'
3 World North Korea creates Facebook accountSouth Korean authorities investigating page for authenticity, illegal content
4 World India gives Pakistan $5.2 million in flood aidCost of flood damage expected to be billions of dollars
5 Business American Apparel teetering on the brink of bankruptcyCompany admits its survival is a “going concern”
MORE NEED TO KNOW adUtility.insertAd("multi_ad", { type: adUtility._AD_MULTIAD }); From Macleans Canada The controversy behind a remote town's stimulus projectOttawa's $1.1-million deal with a Quebec hotel sparks cries of favouritism
Need to know There's no such thing as a "cougar"Study claims women focus on cues indicative of wealth and status
World What's the new global source for fresh, shiny produce?Famine-ridden Ethiopia
Sports Can this man save Tiger Woods?Swing coach Sean Foley has made believers out of golf's young stars. That gets people talking.
Canada Do you trust your doctor?An exclusive Maclean's poll shows that an increasing number of Canadians don’t
Arts & Culture Turning the other cheek in GazaWhen an Israeli rocket killed his children, this Palestinian doctor took a vow: not to hate
Newsmakers Olympic aftermath, The man with the "golden arm' and did Tea Partiers scald David Frum?Newsmakers
/* */ Blogs Canada World Business Culture Opinion Health Environment OnCampus Travel Multimedia Quizzes ArchivesMaclean's is Canada's only national weekly current affairs magazine. Maclean's enlightens, engages, and entertains 2.4 million readers with strong investigative reporting and exclusive stories from leading journalists in the fields of international affairs, social issues, national politics, business and culture.
Advertise Subscribe About Us Privacy Policy Terms of Service In-Class Programs Internships ContactMaclean's is part of the Canadian Business Network
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-751226-3"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); var RDMVideoTracker = new Object(); RDMVideoTracker.sPlayerName = "Maclean's Video Player"; document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + analyticsProtocol + analyticsHostServer + "/js/RDMVideoTracker.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js' %3E%3C/script%3E")); COMSCORE.beacon({ c1:2, c2:3005682, c3:"", c4:"", c5:"", c6:"", c15:"" }); _qoptions={qacct:'p-18-mFEk4J448M',labels:'language.en,vip.macleans'}; try{COMSCORE.beacon({c1:2,c2:7518284});}catch(e){} st_go({'blog':'2865078','v':'wpcom','user_id':'0','post':'143100','subd':'macleans'}); ex_go({'crypt':'RDZ8LFkxbXF0L2M2d1suLnAuMGlWdlJnVmhpUEZOQS5bNjVxTHV3N3RPLkRPWVIySzc/VDVxbS49dFM3TFp1eiZydVg0SU5MOWdGY3p5OU1wQlZsZWRiS0ZYUl00bG1OUTZiaUhqYVUtUyU5U2YtSnh2V191SnNhekZLQ1RzVy10XUk1TUIzRVRJbX5rL1lUOGdlP1E1Ulo2WHhmP251PV13PTBmUmFLVzQwUXU9by0tTXhY'}); addLoadEvent(function(){linktracker_init('2865078',143100);});« Older Comments
If we had a border along Mexico would you let all of the millions of "refugees" in?
If we shared a border with Mexico, we wouldn't have a choice. For an example, see United States of America.
Why bother then with an Immigration or Refugee system at all then? Just let anyone float up and stake their claim…collect their welfare and expensive medical treatment.
Sounds like a beer commercial…I have a raft, I am Canadian!
Step further. Why wait. Let's go out and start looking for people to migrate here.
Good to see some rational commentary on this, congratulations to Andrew Coyne for a thoughtful piece. The usual overheated bluster is restricted to (some of) the comments.
« Older Comments
By posting your comment you agree to the Macleans.ca terms of service and privacy policy.
To add an avatar to your comment, please visit gravatar.com and register the email you use to comment on this site.
Comment
Read Full Article »