RealClearWorld
Advertisement

November 18, 2010

NATO Must Not Retreat from Afghanistan

Daily Telegraph, Daily Telegraph

AP Photo

The Nato summit which opens in Lisbon tomorrow promises – for once – to live up to its billing as the most important meeting in the alliance's 61‑year history. Not only will David Cameron and his fellow members be asked to ratify a new Strategic Concept – a mission statement for the next decade – they will also have to make some tough decisions about just how long Nato is prepared to maintain its commitment to the war in Afghanistan.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Afghanistan, Lisbon, North Atlantic Treaty Organization

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

May 15, 2012
Grading Medvedev's Foreign Policy
Int'l Institute for Strategic Studies
The Duma's confirmation of Dmitry Medvedev as prime minister on 8 May, a day after Vladimir Putin's inauguration as president, marked the completion of their long-anticipated role swap and a new period in Russia's foreign... more ››
May 15, 2012
How Democracies Exit Small Wars
United States Studies Centre
This article published in the Australian Journal of International Affairs argues that opposition political parties can play an important role in determining when and how a democracy exits a small war. Recent theoretical and... more ››
May 15, 2012
Afghan Post-Intervention Era Takes Shape
Jason Burke, The Guardian
With no let-up in the U.S. pullout and peace hopes receding, Afghanistan's post-international-intervention era is taking shape. more ››
May 16, 2012
NATO's Afghan Supply Route Is Hurting Pakistan
Rafia Zakaria, Dawn
It is time that the issue of the Nato supply route began to be evaluated not simply in terms of how crucial the supplies are for US forces battling the Taliban in Afghanistan, but the danger it creates for ordinary Pakistanis... more ››
May 17, 2012
How to Keep Afghanistan Secure
Zalmay Khalilzad, The National Interest
One historic weakness of U.S. foreign policy has been the excessive confidence of policy makers who believe they can foresee the future. As a result, they lock themselves into policies and fail to adjust in time, even when their... more ››
|