January 31, 2012

How Do States Act After They Get Nukes?

James Fearon, The Monkey Cage

AP Photo

All this talk about a possible US and/or Israeli preventive war against Iran got me wondering about the historical record concerning the conflict behavior of states after they acquired nuclear weapons.  Does the rate at which states are involved in serious international disputes tend to go up, down, or see no change after they get the bomb?

 

Advocates of preventive war on Iran like Matthew Kroenig expect Iran to become much more aggressive if it gets nukes.  “Proliferation optimists” like Ken Waltz, by contrast, argue that we have repeatedly expected terrible things from nuclear-armed adversaries but repeatedly found, if anything, the opposite to be the case.  For example, both the Soviets and the US contemplated preventive strikes to prevent Mao from getting...

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Israel, Iran, Nuclear Weapons

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

January 27, 2012
Iran the Tip of a Nuclear Iceberg
Nikolas Gvosdev, World Politics Review
America’s current standoff with Iran over the direction of Tehran’s nuclear program is only one symptom of a larger problem. Concerns over climate change and the rising costs of ever-scarcer hydrocarbons are... more ››
January 26, 2012
A Reality Check on Iran
Institute for Science & International Security
In the discussion regarding the nature of the Iranian nuclear program, some have sought to downplay Iran’s nuclear progress by emphasizing that Iran has not yet “made the decision to build a nuclear... more ››
January 31, 2012
Hamas Hasn't Been Hurt by Syria's Fall
Caroline Glick, Jerusalem Post
Commentators claim that Turkey’s sponsorship of Hamas was necessitated by Iran’s abandonment of the terror group. Iran, it is claimed, cut Hamas off in August due to the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood’s... more ››