February 3, 2012

Why We Shouldn't Attack Syria (Yet)

Robert Pape, New York Times

AP Photo

A new standard for humanitarian intervention is needed. If a continuing government-sponsored campaign of mass homicide - in which thousands have died and many thousands more are likely to die — is occurring, a coalition of countries, sanctioned by major international and regional institutions, should intervene to stop it, as long as they have a viable plan, with minimal risk of casualties for the interveners.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Syria

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

January 31, 2012
Syria's Brutal Shadow War for Hearts & Minds
Ayman Mohyeldin, Time
In Syria, there are concerns that the protracted conflict has become a battle over perception as much as a battle for the future of the country. more ››
January 31, 2012
Get Used to It: Syria Intervention Is Coming
Hussein Ibish, NOW Lebanon
The United States faces a terrible conundrum regarding Syria. The Obama administration wants the regime of Bashar al-Assad gone, but it does not want to see the unfolding of the very processes - conflict and possible ... more ››
January 31, 2012
Saudi Arabia's Role in Syria
Roula Khalaf, Financial Times
Saudi Arabia prefers to work in the shadows, flexing its diplomatic weight without attracting too much attention. So it is surprising that its veteran foreign minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal, lashed out at Syria at an Arab... more ››
January 31, 2012
Saving Syria Requires Russia's Cooperation
Washington Post
The government of Vladimir Putin is insisting that it will not support the removal of a regime that has been its primary ally in the Middle East. Yet if sustained, Moscow's intransigence is likely to precipitate a disaster,... more ››