May 5, 2012

A Civil War Would Be Good for Sudan

Gerard Prunier, New York Times

AP Photo

LESS than a year after South Sudan declared its independence, it appears headed for war once again with its northern neighbor, Sudan. At the same time, marginalized northerners are rebelling against the government of Sudan’s president, Omar Hassan al-Bashir. The international community has called for a cease-fire and peace talks, but the return of violence is not necessarily a bad thing. Soldiers killing one another in war would be far less devastating than thousands of women and children starving to death while waiting for a negotiated peace that will never come.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Sudan

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

May 12, 2012
Time for the U.S. to Arm South Sudan
Andrew Natsios, Washington Post
North and South Sudan are at war. The reasons for the conflict are complex, but the solution is not: To stop the killing, the international community must arm South Sudan. Unlike interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, the United... more ››
May 12, 2012
Around the World, Energy War Heating Up
Michael Klare, The Nation
Conflict and intrigue over valuable energy supplies have been features of the international landscape for a long time. Major wars over oil have been fought every decade or so since World War I, and smaller engagements have... more ››
May 10, 2012
Sudans Brace for a War Both Thought Was Over
Josh Kron, NY Times
South Sudan's years of conflict were meant to be over when it won its independence from Sudan last July after generations of fighting with the people of the north. But the jubilation quickly faded, and now, not even a year... more ››
May 8, 2012
South Sudan's Disastrous First Year
Armin Rosen, The Atlantic
The new African country, founded in part to escape from the northern government's violence, is showing some hostility of its own. more ››
May 8, 2012
The Silence in Sudan
Colum Lynch, Foreign Policy
Why did the United Nations stop reporting atrocities in Darfur? more ››