May 22, 2012

NATO: The Lost Alliance

Tomas Ries, New Atlanticist

AP Photo

A ship is adrift in a foggy sea. The crew are in their bunks, the officers argue about their mortgages, and the captain has left.

The captain has left because the United States no longer believes NATO can contribute significantly against any serious global strategic challenges. An occasional bit player, yes: a partner with the will and capability to contribute significantly, no.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: NATO

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Memo to Europe: Pay your share to help a fledgling Afghan government defend itself against insurgency, and to defend yourself. more ››
May 20, 2012
NATO's Enduring Ties to Afghanistan
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Politico
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit in Chicago on Saturday and Sunday will chart the course of our future engagement in Afghanistan. We plan to spell out the details of our current mission's last stage, and then turn... more ››
May 21, 2012
Why the U.S. Shouldn't Lead NATO
Sarwar Kashmeri, New Atlanticist
After 64 years, it is time to share the baton of NATO leadership with the European Union. What is needed is bold vision of the kind that created the alliance in 1947. Unfortunately, this is not on tap in Chicago. Which is why... more ››
May 20, 2012
Rethink the Russian Reset
The Economist
America's missile-defence plans are aimed at Iran, not Russia. But they are also a token of transatlantic seriousness about Europe. Any suggestion of making them a bargaining chip unsettles those in Poland and elsewhere who... more ››