June 18, 2012

Let China Save Syria

Niall Ferguson, Newsweek

AP Photo

There can be no morally credible argument against intervention - by someone. Leaving Syria to descend into the kind of sectarian violence that devastated neighboring Lebanon in the 1980s would condemn hundreds of thousands to premature, violent death. Syria is five times the size of Lebanon. The risks of leaving it to degenerate into a failed state are surely higher than the risks of intervention.

But why should it be the United States that once again attempts to play the part of global cop?

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Middle East, United States, Syria, China

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

June 13, 2012
Two Worlds Are Cracking Up
Thomas Friedman, New York Times
For many years, strategists have debated whether Turkey would be a "bridge" or a "gully" between predominantly Christian Europe and the Arab/Muslim Middle East. If Turkey were admitted to the European Union, it would be a... more ››
June 5, 2012
Containing Syria's WMDs
Jerusalem Post
There is real danger that loose weaponry and WMDs might fall into the wrong hands, endangering not just Israel's security, but the security and stability of the entire region. more ››
June 15, 2012
Bashar Assad: A Mideast Franco?
Pat Buchanan, American Conservative
As America has declined to intervene in Syria, FDR declared neutrality early in the Spanish Civil War, outlawing any sale of weapons to either side. more ››
June 13, 2012
A New U.S. Strategy in the Mideast
Center for a New American Security
The upheaval that has shaken the Middle East since January 2011 has clearly demonstrated some of the faulty assumptions that have long underpinned U.S. policy in the region. In Strategic Adaptation: Toward a New U.S. Strategy in... more ››