September 4, 2012

Is Peace a 'Vital' American Interest?

Hussein Ibish, NOW Lebanon

AP Photo

“Resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a vital national security interest,” the voice of the American foreign policy consensus has intoned, with its trademark gravitas, for the past decade. “But,” it continues sagely, “We cannot want peace more than the parties themselves.” Around Washington wise heads have nodded grimly at the self-evidence of this hegemonic dictum. Few have stopped to notice that this formulation is internally inconsistent to the point of being an oxymoron. Either resolving the conflict is a vital interest or it isn't.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: 2012, Barack Obama, United States, Palestine, Israel

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

August 26, 2012
Paul Ryan's Principled Foreign Policy
Kori Schake, Foreign Policy
Paul Ryan's most forceful statement of his views emphasizes the limits on our foreign policy that our national indebtedness will occasion. This is a principled position the Obama administration wholly lacks, running deficits of a... more ››
August 28, 2012
Australians Deluded About U.S. Election
Peter Hartcher, Sydney M.H.
A much more realistic way for Australians to assess the US is as a foreign country. As soon as we take that view, the question changes dramatically. It's not which candidate you prefer, but which is likely to be better for... more ››
August 26, 2012
Syria's Cry, America's Cowardice
Michael Weiss, NY Daily News
U.S. policy has been a muddle of contradictions and half-baked excuses that risk robbing Washington of any influence it might have in a post-Assad Syria. The standard rationalization against even arming the rebels is that... more ››
How would an anti-WMD operation by the U.S. and its allies work? Unclear. Syria's biological and chemical weapons are reported to be widely dispersed at as many as two dozen storage sites. Bombing such sites could be effective,... more ››
August 25, 2012
China Loath to Wait for Romney to Learn
Frank Ching, Japan Times
Beijing has attempted to maintain a neutral stance in the election, which it views as an internal American affair. However, it is likely to feel more comfortable with a second Obama term than a Romney presidency. more ››