September 7, 2012

Where the Candidates Stand on Defense

Michael O'Hanlon, CNN

AP Photo

With the political conventions, Veterans of Foreign Wars speeches, party and campaign platforms all now on the record, what can we conclude about the key question of the differences in defense strategy and spending between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney?

This is only one aspect of the foreign policy debate between the two candidates. But it is still hugely important – and about far more than a technical discussion over which fighter jet to buy or how many new ships to build. Indeed, the issue reveals a great deal about the worldviews of the candidates, and also links directly to their fiscal and therefore economic strategies – the top issue in this year's race and itself a matter of national security.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: defense spending, 2012, Barack Obama, Mitt Romney

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Today, it is the Democratic Party that almost all alone occupies that once bipartisan space in national security policy, and it is the Democratic Party that today offers the clear-eyed vision of how to best honor our ideas in the... more ››
September 2, 2012
A Real War & a Phony War
William Kristol, Weekly Standard
We’re at war. More than 68,000 troops are deployed to Afghanistan. More than 2,000 Americans have died in over 10 years of fighting. The war has quiet bipartisan support. Too quiet. more ››
September 5, 2012
It's Mitt's World
Thomas Friedman, New York Times
Republicans love to criticize Obama for "leading from behind." But if you're not leading by example in an interdependent world, you can lead from the front or behind - no one will follow you for long. more ››
September 9, 2012
Romney Can Play Offense on Foreign Policy
Alana Goodman, Commentary
Romney has so many opportunities to dominate the argument on foreign policy. But if he continues to view it as a secondary issue, he deserves to lose it. more ››
September 5, 2012
Who-Built-It Debate Pits U.S. Against Europe
Edward Glaeser, Bloomberg
These phrases don't imply anything about concrete policy, yet the debate reflects a deep ideological divide that goes back 150 years. And the battle over the relative roles of social collaboration and individual initiative is not... more ››