September 28, 2012

A Legal Basis to Attack Iran

J. Smith & J. Bellinger, Washington Post

AP Photo

The question of whether military force should be used to prevent, or at least delay, Iran from building a nuclear weapon is again on the front pages. Both President Obama and Mitt Romney have said they would consider a military strike against Iran. According to media reports, the necessary planning has been completed, and military options are “fully available.”

But there has been almost no discussion of whether an attack by the United States would be legal under domestic and international law. This should be a priority. Law is important, especially in issues of war and peace.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Nuclear Weapons, Iran

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

September 18, 2012
War of Sabotage Against Iran's Nukes
David Blair, Telegraph Blogs
Every so often, the veil is lifted on the shadowy war of sabotage being waged against Iran’s nuclear facilities. Another of those moments arrived yesterday when Fereydoun Abbasi, the head of Iran’s Atomic Energy... more ››
September 24, 2012
Tehran's Nuclear Balancing Act
Int'l Institute for Strategic Studies
Iranian leaders must realize that failing to limit the enrichment program will eventually trigger war As summer draws to an end, a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear crisis remains nowhere in sight. Despite... more ››
One of the key assumptions shared by backers of military counter-proliferation is that with enough timely intelligence, the U.S. and its key allies can bomb, interdict, sabotage, and otherwise neutralize the nuclear weapons... more ››
September 24, 2012
Netanyahu Is in a Box
Dan Ephron, Newsweek
Benjamin Netanyahu was fuming. For the first time in months, the Israeli leader had allowed a discussion in his security cabinet about Iran’s nuclear program and it wasn’t going well. Several cabinet members were ... more ››