October 14, 2012

Naiveté: Afghanistan's Latest Victim

Jeffrey Simpson, Globe and Mail

AP Photo

It is possible, one supposes, for the electoral process to become fair, for a transition to take place to a properly elected democratic government that will negotiate with the insurgents for peace and stability after NATO departs. Certainly, there will be no negotiations as long as NATO remains, because neither the Americans nor the Taliban want talks. Afghans will eventually have to sort out things for themselves, whatever that will mean.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Canada, Afghanistan

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

October 6, 2012
Canada's Dangerous Religious Freedom
Doug Saunders, Globe and Mail
It’s time to speak out against religious freedom. Or, to be precise, against its promotion and the way it’s used. To those of us who believe freedoms should be absolute and robust, and are ardently opposed to the... more ››
October 6, 2012
Why Canada Bucks the Two Party System
David Frum, National Post
The same two political parties, Republicans and Democrats, have divided power in the United States for almost 160 years. Populists, Progressives, Socialists and Dixiecrats have occasionally elected a senator or governor.... more ››
October 5, 2012
Canada's All or Nothing Abortion Debate
Emma Teitel, Maclean's
The Conservatives didn’t want to open debate surrounding Bill M-312. MPs weighed in anyways. more ››
October 13, 2012
Canada Courts the Middle Powers
Paul Wells, Maclean's
In the panoply of tools available to a cabinet minister, public remarks are always a sign that a written statement wasn’t thought to be enough. So Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird was sending a clear signal on Oct. 3... more ››
Just how much of Canada’s vast oil and gas wealth is Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative government prepared to put in the hands of China’s state-owned firms or other foreign actors? It’s a question that has been... more ››