October 18, 2012

A Third Option for Dealing with Iran

Richard Haass, Project Syndicate

AP Photo

Most of the debate about how to address Iran’s efforts to develop nuclear-weapons capacity focuses on two options. The first is to rely on deterrence and live with an Iran that has a small nuclear arsenal or the ability to assemble one with little advance notice. The second is to launch a preventive military strike aimed at destroying critical parts of the Iranian program and setting back its progress by an estimated two or more years.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Iran's nuclear installation, Iran

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

October 5, 2012
Iran's Self-Destruction
Daily Telegraph
The most sensible course is to let the full weight of sanctions take their inexorable toll. more ››
October 5, 2012
Iran Offers 9-Step Plan to End Nuke Crisis
David Sanger, NY Times
With harsh economic sanctions contributing to the first major protests in Iran in three years, Iranian officials have begun to describe what they call a “nine-step plan” to defuse the nuclear crisis with the West by gradually... more ››
October 5, 2012
How Politics Nuked Iran's Economy
Meir Javedanfar, The Diplomat
Iran is facing a threat even more severe than the Stuxnet computer virus, a sophisticated line of code which was reportedly sponsored by the U.S. and Israel, and which destroyed some of Iran’s uranium centrifuges in 2010. In... more ››
October 7, 2012
Is Hezbollah Planning a Drone War?
Alex Fishman, Ynet News
In the next war drones will come from the north in waves, and Gaza may contribute its part as well, as Hamas is working independently to develop its own UAVs. more ››