March 12, 2013

The Danger of an Afghan 'Moon Landing'

Dominic Tierney, The Atlantic

AP Photo

In one of his first major statements on Afghanistan as Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel defined America's "clear and achievable" objective in Afghanistan: "to have Afghans assume full responsibility for security by the end of 2014." America's core aim has narrowed dramatically: to hand over power and withdraw.

The new goal is certainly clear and achievable. Indeed, the United States could accomplish Afghan responsibility right now, simply by leaving. The danger is that the mission turns into what Gideon Rose once called a "moon landing," or an operation designed to transport Americans far away and bring them home safely with little regard for what's left behind.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Chuck Hagel, Afghanistan

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

March 12, 2013
To Hell with Karzai
Leslie Gelb, The Daily Beast
Hamid Karzai is beating up on the United States to score domestic political points once again, this time on the occasion of Chuck Hagel’s maiden visit as Defense secretary to that sad country. Yet the Obama team and ... more ››
February 27, 2013
Obama Hasn't Beaten the Israel Lobby
Stephen Walt, Foreign Policy
Chuck Hagel survived the assualt, but President Obama has not won the war. more ››
March 3, 2013
So Much for the All-Powerful 'Israel Lobby'
Lee Smith, Tablet Magazine
Despite an operating budget of more than $60 million, on the most crucial issue facing Israel’s security, AIPAC has lost the policy debate. The winners include those who believe you can’t stop a nation from getting... more ››
March 6, 2013
Was Afghanistan Worth It?
James Joyner, The National Interest
The situation in Helmand is doubtless better off than when the Marines doubled down their effort there, making it "the defining battleground" of the campaign. Was it worth the 360 dead and 4700 wounded Marines it cost to get to... more ››