December 13, 2013

Is a Final Deal with Iran Possible?

Asculai & Landau, The National Interest

The Associated Press

The interim agreement between the P5+1 and Iran does not address Iran’s military nuclear activities and aspirations. Its only stated purpose was to freeze the current situation – possibly delaying Iran’s decision to ‘breakout’, and slightly prolonging the time that would be needed to achieve the ability to produce a nuclear explosive device if/when a decision is taken – with an eye to gaining time for negotiating a comprehensive deal.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Iran, Nuclear Weapons

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

December 12, 2013
The Globe's Nuclear Gangsters
Victor Davis Hanson, National Review
Hostile countries with nuclear capabilities have the upper hand on the global police. more ››
December 1, 2013
The Coming Nuclear Arms Race in the Gulf
John Hannah, Foreign Policy
How Washington stabbed the Saudis in the back, and why the Iran deal will start a nuclear arms race in the Persian Gulf. more ››
December 9, 2013
Iran, from Enemy to Ally
David Patrikarakos, New York Times
The recent nuclear deal with Iran has caused a predictable furor among Middle East hawks. But it offers an opportunity for a much bigger breakthrough: rapprochement and, eventually, even strategic cooperation with Iran. more ››
December 3, 2013
Nuclear Weapons Don't Spread Quickly
Zachary Keck, The Diplomat
Or, in Cartwright’s own words: “[If] a country wants these weapons, they can get them … So you have to start to think of alternatives to the threats of: ‘I’m going to attack you.’” Cartwright is hardly alone in... more ››
December 6, 2013
U.S. and Iran See Deal Differently
Jonathan Schanzer, Global Public Sq.
The nuclear deal between the P5+1 and Iran last month has been widely hailed as a successful interim measure to stave off an unwanted conflict over Tehran’s illicit nuclear program. But after initially celebrating a diplomatic... more ››