July 9, 2014

Barack Obama: Destabilizer-in-Chief

Mario Loyola, National Review

The Associated Press

The Obama administration makes the excuse that because Iraq’s National Assembly refused to pass a law granting immunity from local criminal prosecution for U.S. troops, we were forced to leave. This is preposterous, and the media should stop repeating it. Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki offered to issue an executive order that would have satisfied U.S. concerns. Indeed, minimal U.S. forces are now back in Iraq under cover of just such an executive order. But the bigger point is that we had just won the war. We had defeated all the warring factions in Iraq. By 2009 virtually all the factions had some degree of dependency on the U.S., and they all understood that we were going to leave when we were good and ready.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Middle East, Barack Obama, U.S. Foreign Policy, United States

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

June 30, 2014
Dick Cheney Just Buried the Bush Doctrine
Peter Beinart, The Atlantic
The former vice president rejected democracy-promotion in the Middle East. And today's conservatives agree with him. more ››
Though the United States has yet to secure a final deal to restrain Iran's nuclear program, an influential pair of hawks in Washington have already devised a way for Congress to unravel any potential agreement after the ink is... more ››
July 6, 2014
How the White House Blew It on ISIS
Eli Lake, The Daily Beast
Team Obama was told, over and over, that the Iraqi army couldn’t stop a terror group that was ready to pounce. But Washington was a prisoner to its paradox of an Iraq policy. more ››
July 6, 2014
Mitt Romney Was Right About Foreign Policy
Alex Wong, Politico Mag
The animating theory that underlay Romney’s view of the world was that the United States and its allies are in strategic competition with rival systems of governance, and always have been. “Other global strategies,... more ››
June 26, 2014
Obama Must Find His Inner Cold Warrior
Suzanne Nossel, Foreign Policy
The problem with being a post-deterrence U.S. president is that without deterrence, the world we live in quickly becomes dangerous. more ››