China's Stand on North Korea Under Fire

By Shim Jae Hoon
‹‹Previous Page |1 | 2 |

He might just well have added that Beijing was fully behind Kim Jong Un’s position on the nuclear issue. After denying the North’s nuclear program as fiction for years, Beijing now limits its role to repeating bland commitment to a nuclear-free peninsula. China increasingly must keep North Korea afloat as a nation. As a major patron on the international stage, China no longer cares to conceal its protective role over North Korea’s errant military behaviors. At the UN Security Council, China refuses to endorse resolutions condemning the North’s nuclear tests, or attacks on a South Korean warship and artillery shelling of Yeonpyong Island, killing 50 people altogether in 2010. In defiance of a UN resolution sanctioning arms supply to Pyongyang, China continues to send military vehicles and fuel so that the North Korea can maintain force along the border with South Korea. Lately, China’s role as an economic lifeline has only grown, as it supplies several hundred thousand tons of food aid that helps feed the North Korean army.

These military and political ties have had the effect of undermining Seoul’s multifarious relations with China, with which South Korea runs a substantial bilateral trade worth more than U.S.$200 billion U.S. a year, mostly in Korea’s favor. While economically beneficial to Seoul, this trade imbalance puts the Lee Myung Bak administration on the political defensive at home. With Beijing constantly breathing over his shoulder, President Lee has denied a visa to the Tibetan spiritual leader Dalai Lama and another visit from a Xinjiang Uighur separatist representative.

Other areas of people-to-people diplomacy are also fraying. Incursions of Chinese fishing fleets into South Korean waters last year caused repeated clashes with Korean coastal patrols. After two Korean coast guardsmen were killed by Chinese resisting arrest with picks and axes, Korean authorities issued orders for the guard to fire if in danger, touching off emotional attacks on South Korea in Chinese state media.

By and large, South Koreans regard China’s close association with the Pyongyang regime as the price of political alliance and geographic proximity. What bothers many, however, is Chinese support for Pyongyang’s totalitarian system at the expense of human rights, as evident in a growing number of young protesters outside the Chinese embassy in Seoul. One parliamentarian held an 11-day hunger strike in front of the Chinese embassy, protesting Beijing’s insistence on sending back about 30 North Korean defectors who had crossed into its territory. Hundreds, including movie stars, hold daily rallies denouncing the Chinese government, demanding that the defectors be allowed to go to South Korea in accordance with international practices governing refuges. The defectors remain in China for now.

Receive email alerts

China maintains the defectors are economic migrants, illegal border crossers, not refugees as defined under the UN High Commission for Refugees. In collaboration with security agents from Pyongyang, Chinese border authorities return up to 8000 North Korean defectors each year. Once sent back, defectors are sentenced to years in detention camps, tortured or even publicly executed to warn others. With punishment so severe, many defectors rely on underground support networks, travelling thousands of kilometers disguised as Chinese, to reach Laos, Vietnam or Thailand.

In Seoul in late February, Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi reaffirmed the principle of handling defectors on a case-by-case review. Some receive humanitarian considerations, while others are treated as bona fide refugees. But Yang issued a stern warning that South Korea should not politicize the plights of defectors or internationalize their cases at UN and other agencies. To many Korean protesters, that sounded like Old Imperial China lording over hapless Koreans.

In the long run, China’s position on North Korea’s nuclear issue will test the strength of Seoul’s relations with Beijing. No one here buys China’s argument that it has no leverage over the Pyongyang regime, and some associate this view with China’s recent refusal to intervene and stop the mass killings inside Syria.

Closer to home, with China backing succession of the Kim dynasty, continuing its lifeline, more Koreans regard China not as a responsible guardian of international order but a cynical and selfish power.

‹‹Previous Page |1 | 2 |

Shim Jae Hoon in a Seoul-based journalist.

Copyright © 2012 Yale Center for the Study of Globalization. Yale Global

(AP Photo)

Sponsored Links
Related Articles
May 16, 2012
Asia as Global Leader - Not So Fast - Ho Kwon Ping
Shim Jae Hoon
Author Archive