The British Retreat from Iraq

As the British hand over Basra to US forces, the battle over who screwed up "“ the military or the politicians "“ is just beginning

They have been beating retreat at Basra airfield today as the British hand over command to the Americans for the next two years. This marks the end of the latest British military promenade into Mesopotamia and Iraq, the fourth in under a century "“ and, presumably, British troops will not be coming this way again in a hurry.

The present contingent of 4,100 leaves by the end of July, with only a 400 staying on till 2011, to help with training some Iraqi army units and the police.

British commanders this week were keen to put a high gloss on what had been achieved in the past six years since British troops went in "shoulder to shoulder" with their American allies in George Bush and Tony Blair's great adventure to overthrow Saddam Hussein. In those six years, 175 British lives have been lost in combat operations and many times that number wounded physically and psychologically. It has cost the British taxpayer well over £10bn, and bills for damaged and lost lives "“ not to mention, an army with its equipment and operational capability run ragged "“ will have to be met for years to come.

How we got into the 21st century's greatest war of choice so far, should be the subject of the official enquiry which the government is reluctantly setting up. However much the powers fudge it, the inquiry will have to answer the growing public disquiet that this was indeed an optional war, devised and run largely to an American script.

For two years now, the main aim has to been to get the British forces out of Iraq reasonably intact, still keeping their good name and the confidence of the senior ally, America, and the Iraqi authorities. The jury is largely out still on all of these counts. There have been continuing problems with both the Maliki regime and the Americans, whose direction of travel is still in the grip of George W Bush's camp followers to a surprising degree.

Well-known hawks like retired General Jack Keane, now claiming credit as the architect of US forces' successful "surge" offensive last, say the British lost their bottle and "surrendered" the streets of Basra to the Shi'ite militias in 2007. It took the Americans and the Iraqis' own surge to get the militias off the streets in April last year in the operation known as "the Charge of the Knights", according to the hawks and neocons' oversimplistic narrative.

In fact, nothing of the kind was available before Spring 2008. The Iraqis did not have the trained troops available for a Basra surge the year before, and besides the Americans were against it. The war of words and spin surrounding this and other episodes "“ much of the Iraq operation, in fact "“ should give any British government and military command warning not to offer such blind support to the American military and administration on matters of war and peace as they have over Iraq, and are continuing to over strategy in Afghanistan.

This week, the British commander, Major General Andy Salmon, said British forces had succeeded in changing the lives of Iraqis in Basra. "Those who are old enough to realise, and compare it with the past gloom of Saddam's era, they look back to 30 years ago and say, 'We're seeing stability that we haven't had before; we're seeing levels of freedom that we haven't had before.'"

The problems of Basra appeared from early on. Society imploded and carbonised into a round of destruction, looting and vendettas. The presence and power of the militias and local Shi'ite factions were underestimated from the first. And to the last, one might say "“ for much of the success of the American surge led by General Petraeus has stemmed from the militias, Moqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi army in particular, applying a voluntary ceasefire until the Americans go away. The British knew they could never take and hold a municipality of 1.5 million. They didn't have the military manpower, the mandate locally or the political support in the UK. When the Americans realised that they faced defeat in Iraq in 2006, they doubled the resources behind their operational forces there "“ whereas the British proportionally were cutting back. What did happen to the British will be raked over for years to come. There's plenty of scope, as there still isn't a serious analysis of the whole weird episode from a British perspective that would compare to Cobra II by Michael Gordon of the New York Times, and Fiasco by Tom Ricks of the Washington Post. But we now have the promise, or rather half-promise, from Foreign Secretary David Miliband of an official enquiry into the Iraq operation. However, according to the Guardian, much of this is likely to be conducted behind closed doors. Moreover, Miliband has said that it will focus on the conduct of the war, because we know sufficient about its origins through the Hutton and Butler enquiries.

In other words, it will be a classic bit of spin and conjuring, of which Tony Blair and Alastair Campbell would be proud. By concentrating on operations, it will blame the commanders and the poor bloody infantry on the ground "“ which everyone in Whitehall, from the marble halls of New Labour to the deep bunkers of the Treasury, the FCO and MoD love to do "“ and are very good at. Ministers and their advisers must be asked to account in public for how they drifted into such an ill-thought-out enterprise in Iraq in the first place. They must also account for the string of bad decisions and poor judgments they continued to make in the years since the initial invasion in March 2003. The present mood of buckpassing and shoulder-shrugging about Iraq bodes ill for future policy-making about Afghanistan "“ and wherever else British forces may be called to act.

If our parliament and politicians aren't up to putting the decision-makers under the necessary scrutiny, others may well do it. After all, we do now have, at least in name, the Freedom of Information Act, and the spin doctors and censors of Westminster and Whitehall will find it hard to defeat the growing momentum for debate and enquiry in the blogosphere about the New Labour record on war and truth.

Your IP address will be logged

Related

Robert Fox: Bush sounds the retreat from Iraq

Cost of Afghanistan and Iraq operations soars

Britain defends its troops against criticism by Afghan president

Brown outlines UK's role in future of Afghanistan

Your IP address will be logged

Loading 0% complete

Loading comments...

Go to all comments on one page

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

Register | Sign in

Go to all comments on one page

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

Register | Sign in

In order to see comments, please turn JavaScript on in your browser.

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Apologies, something has gone wrong and this action cannot be completed. Please try again later.

${comment.PostedAtTime|formatDateTime:MessageTime}

${comment.PostedAtTime|formatDateTime:MessageTime}

You have  characters left

Please read our community standards.

Loading...............

Closing this window without pressing "Post your comment" will result in your words being lost. Are you sure?

Thank you for your comment. This has been submitted for moderation.

Your comment has been successfully posted.

Sorry, something has gone wrong and this action cannot be completed. Please try again later.

Close

Please choose a problem:

Comment: (optional)

You have 5000 characters left

Logged in as

Your email address: (optional)

Loading...............

Closing this window without pressing "Report" will result in your words being lost. Are you sure?

Thank you

Sorry, something has gone wrong and this action cannot be completed. Please try again later.

${blog_item.article.title} (${blog_item.linkcount}{if blog_item_index == 0} technorati links{/if})

Loading …

More

Today's rising blog posts from

Powered by wrist movement with no need for batteries, this watch is still highly accurate.

From: £49.99

Anthony Giddens: We can't wait for Copenhagen, individual countries must start implementing strategies to tackle global warming now

Niall Stanage: As its industry collapses, is there any hope for a grindingly poor city where half the people can't read and 22% are unemployed?

Browse all jobs

dragonfly. sponsorship sales executive - energy event. £20000 - £24000 per annum + Bonus.

Read Full Article »
Comment
Show commentsHide Comments

Related Articles