JALREZ BAZAAR, Afghanistan — A year ago, the Taliban were tormenting this lush valley just miles from the Afghan capital, kidnapping people and blocking the road.
Jalrez may be an indicator of the benefit of additional troops.
All that changed when American troops arrived in February. They dropped from helicopters and set up three camps where there had been none, expecting a fight. Instead, the Taliban put up almost no resistance and left for other areas. Now trucks travel freely and merchants no longer fear for their lives.
“Compared with last year, it’s 100 percent different,” said Muhamed Zaker, an apple farmer from the area.
The Jalrez Valley is a test case, the first area in Afghanistan where President Obama’s strategy of increasing troop levels has been applied, and it is a promising early indicator.
But in Afghanistan, a complex patchwork of tribes, ethnicities and rivalries, it remains unclear whether the early success in this area can be replicated. In the painstaking business of counterinsurgency, security requires more than just extra troops. It means giving Afghans reasons to reject the insurgents by providing the basic trappings of a state — an effective police force, enough government services, and economic opportunity so they can work rather than fight.
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has said the troops here have about a year to show they can turn around the momentum of the war, before Afghan and American patience runs out.
But Afghanistan is a country where only a third of the population can read and even the most rudimentary infrastructure is lacking, and commanders on the ground say rushing the process would be a mistake.
“It’s construction, not reconstruction,” one American officer said, comparing the task with that in Iraq, where the American effort was referred to as reconstruction.
One problem is that the gains in Jalrez could still be temporary. Insurgents regularly leave areas where Americans appear, only to resurface later. “We are hearing it’s better now,” said Hoji Mir Ahmad, a fruit merchant based in Kabul, “but God knows what things will be like when the harvest comes.”
When the Americans came to the Jalrez Valley, a skinny finger of green just 30 miles west of Kabul, the capital, Taliban fighters had controlled it for more than a year, taking advantage of a virtual absence of American troops. A unit of about 200 American soldiers had patrolled an area of half a million people and was so thinly spread that its captain had to drive 12 hours to hold a meeting with a local leader.
Humiliations had become routine: The Taliban would blacken the faces of men they said were thieves and parade them. In Jalrez Bazaar, a town west of the valley, eight people were killed in 2008, residents said.
“It looked like we didn’t have any destiny,” said Momin Shah, a farmer, sitting on a crate in a small supply shop.
Fearing that the Taliban were tightening their hold around Kabul, the Americans were sent to secure the two provinces just south and west of it, Logar and Wardak, the gateway to the capital and the location of the country’s main north-south highway.
Then came the first surprise: The Taliban left for other areas rather than fight. Musa Hotak, a member of Parliament from Jalrez District who is a former Taliban commander, said the two main militant leaders had moved with their families to Pakistan.
The reason, American officers said, was simple math. The new contingent increased the number of Americans tenfold. “Mass counts,” said Lt. Col. Kimo Gallahue, a commander in the new battalion.
What is now causing unrest in Jalrez is an assortment of low-level criminals, Americans and Afghans said, men who may be thought of as Taliban, but whose main pursuit is money, not infidels. (The main target in Jalrez is a man whose last big crime was stealing solar panels.) That gives the Americans hope that if they bring money and jobs fast enough here and to the rest country, they could substantially weaken the insurgency.
“I learned everything I know about the Jalrez insurgency from ‘The Sopranos,’ ” Colonel Gallahue said. “At the foot soldier level, it’s economically driven.”
For Afghans, life has improved, a fact that, for Jalrez Bazaar residents, has trumped the irritation at having foreign troops on Afghan soil. “People hate them but it’s better to have them here,” said Shah Mahmoud, a farmer, 70. If security is established, “we don’t need the Americans and they don’t need us.”
In the rules of counterinsurgency, soldiers must move quickly — but carefully — to solidify gains.
The Americans are trying to strike a delicate balance between wooing villagers with public works projects and continuing to put pressure on insurgents in the same areas. Progress is slow.
Abdul Waheed Wafa contributed reporting.
Click here to enjoy the convenience of home delivery of The Times for 50% off. Past CoverageNATIONAL BRIEFING | SOUTH; Florida: Guilty Plea by Contractors (May 27, 2009)Nomination of U.S. Afghan Commander Revives Questions in Tillman Case (May 26, 2009)Autopsies of War Dead Reveal Ways to Save Others (May 26, 2009)U.S. Captain Hears Pleas for Afghan Detainee (May 25, 2009) Related Searches Afghanistan War (2001- ) Get E-Mail Alerts United States Defense and Military Forces Get E-Mail Alerts Afghanistan Get E-Mail Alerts Defense and Military Forces Get E-Mail Alerts Next Article in World (2 of 22) » MOST POPULAR E-Mailed Blogged Searched Frank Rich: Who Is to Blame for the Next Attack? Recipes for Health: Healthier Pizzas Put Ad on Web. Count Clicks. Revise. Cyberwar: Contractors Vie for Plum Work, Hacking for U.S. The Way We Live Now: Let the Kid Be The Mellowing of William Jefferson Clinton Politics Can Wait: The President Has a Date Paul Krugman: Reagan Did It 36 Hours at the Grand Canyon Green Promise Seen in Switch to LED Lighting Go to Complete List » Abortion Doctor Shot to Death in Church Who Is to Blame for the Next Attack? The Waves Minority Judges Always Make The Obamas in New York: Dinner and a Show Court Choice Pushes Issue of 'Identity Politics' Back to Forefront G.M. Tallies Bondholder Votes on Equity Plan Deep Cuts Threaten to Reshape California Susan Boyle Loses on British Talent TV Show Contractors Vie for Plum Work, Hacking for U.S. Rogues, Robes and Racists Go to Complete List » korea may 4, 2009 cancer china obama swine flu modern love india sotomayor berlusconi Go to Complete List » new Accordian("mostPopWidget"); The fate of the Meadowlands Xanadu
Also in Real Estate »
When "affordable" is still out of reach Views of a floating market Advertisements Inside NYTimes.com Media & Advertising » A Revolution in Prime Time, but Will It Work? Opinion » Errol Morris: Bamboozling Ourselves T Magazine » T Magazine: Design Summer 2009 Opinion » Editorial Observer: Pringles Are Potato Chips
Good news for fans of no-nonsense legal opinions.
Music » Minuets, Sonatas and Politics in the West Bank Week in Review » The Waves Minority Judges Always Make N.Y. / Region » Where One Man’s Trash Is Students’ Art Material Opinion » Goodbye to the Local Car Dealer World » In Hong Kong, Civil Liberties Within Limits Opinion » Op-Ed: Saving the M.T.A.
Whoever takes the helm of the M.T.A. needs the backing of all of New York's elected leaders.
U.S. » A Town Fights to Save an Oasis of Baguettes Music » Country’s King Rules With Restraint Home World U.S. N.Y. / Region Business Technology Science Health Sports Opinion Arts Style Travel Jobs Real Estate Automobiles Back to Top Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company Privacy Policy Search Corrections RSS First Look Help Contact Us Work for Us Site Map Tacoda_AMS_DDC_addPair("t_section","World, Asia") Tacoda_AMS_DDC_addPair("site","nytimes.com") Tacoda_AMS_DDC("http://te.nytimes.com/tte/blank.gif","1.0")
Good news for fans of no-nonsense legal opinions.
Whoever takes the helm of the M.T.A. needs the backing of all of New York's elected leaders.
Read Full Article »