The United States and its allies have been prosecuting the war on drugs for almost a century. They have never looked like they're winning but they have carried on regardless. In the past year, however, the supporters of drug prohibition have suffered some important tactical defeats. The bipartisan consensus in Washington, although still powerful, is beginning to slip. But there is a strategic issue now facing supporters of prohibition that presents them with their toughest challenge yet, and Canada will be a key battleground. This will unfold in the next decade and may bring an end to the war on drugs, which has consistently failed to achieve its stated aims despite devouring hundreds of billions of taxpayers' dollars.
At the heart of this problem lie synthetic drugs--pills that are changing the rules, pushing out the old organic masters, cocaine and heroin, and turning the geopolitics of narcotics upside down. It is something that the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) is beginning to fret about.
For years, UNODC and its boss, Antonio Maria Costa, have been among the most vocal supporters of the war on drugs. UNODC has been the United States' spearhead for its global campaign (it is the only UN agency for which Washington coughs up its contribution on time every year without moaning about it). And appointments like Costa's are carefully vetted by the Americans. He and his colleagues have long demanded ever-more punitive responses against drug users and traffickers with a rhetoric that stands in sharp contrast to the usual strains of Kumbaya coming out of most UN agencies. I was shocked when Sandro Calvani, Costa's representative in Bogota and a biologist by background, told me, "If somebody should tell me that they have found a new Agent Orange gas that kills all coca but damages the environment very heavily, I would consider it."�
But earlier this year, a note of despair could be heard in Antonio Maria Costa's voice when he addressed the 10-year review of UNODC in Vienna. Despite an intense policing and PR campaign in the major drug producer and consumer areas around the world, the use of drugs has been steadily rising in volume and spreading in geographical reach. The latest region to fall under the dark shadow of South America's cocaine cartels is West Africa"”countries like Sierra Leone and Liberia, fresh from a decade of diamond-driven fratricide, are now used as staging posts for cocaine export to Europe. The wealth and power of the criminal gangs who control these vast markets have ballooned. There has been no concomitant increase in resources available to law enforcement.
In recognition of the difficulties facing the U.S.'s policy on narcotics, the Obama administration quietly told its official representatives to stop using the phrase "war on drugs," at UNODC's review conference. A month later, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton crossed another line on an official visit to Mexico City when she became the first senior American official to admit that demand for cocaine and cannabis use in the United States is a central driver of the drug problem.
But the most vocal criticism of the war on drugs comes from the developing world and especially South America. It's been denounced by countless senior lawmakers, law enforcement officers and judges, especially in two countries most devastated by the trade"”Brazil and Mexico. In February, three former presidents from Brazil, Colombia and Mexico published a searing critique of American policies, highlighting how their countries bear the brunt of the violence and instability generated by the criminal trade in drugs.
Canada"”and Vancouver in particular"”has had a few beginners' lessons in the past couple of years about how distressing the violence associated with wholesale drug trafficking, as opposed to mere drug consumption, can be. But if UNODC is correct in its prognosis, the drug problem in Canada is about to get worse, not better. The reason for this lies in shifting patterns of drug consumption.
In the past two years, heroin, cocaine and even cannabis consumption has levelled off"”partly because supply is now satisfying demand. But at the same time, the use of synthetic drugs"”chiefly methamphetamine, amphetamine and ecstasy (MDMA)"”has begun to grow rapidly. The trend was already obvious to U.S. border guards in Washington state two years ago. At Oroville, just across from Osoyoos, B.C., U.S. customs officers told me that while marijuana and cocaine seizures remain at a constant level, they were finding increasingly large amounts of methamphetamine and ecstasy in trucks and cars going from Canada into the U.S.
While America boasts the largest number of laboratories producing these pills, Canada's labs are the largest on the continent, especially the ecstasy factories. They are largely controlled by the Asian gangs and Hells Angels chapters who both played such a big role in turning up the violence associated with the cocaine and marijuana industries in the greater Vancouver area. UNODC's World Drug Report 2009 points out that "Canada has grown to be the most important producer of MDMA for North America, and since 2006, all ecstasy laboratories reported have been large-capacity facilities operated principally by Asian organized crime groups."�
Pages: 1 2
PreviousCanada is Colombia North
Very interesting article. Well done.
The most interesting part of the article to me is the manufacture of drugs by asian gangs and the hells angels. I do think that meth and all drugs need to be legalized and controlled. But meth and heroine really scare me. But through legalization there could be softer approaches to these drugs, like opium and white crosses instead of the heavy stuff. Thats a more reasonable approach to legalization and would curb peoples desire for harder drugs. Just like during the prohibition of alcohol you couldn't find beer or wine but there was all the hard stuff, you could drink, because it can command more money.
Hey Harper.. way to fight the War on Drugs… youre losing badly. Time to pack it in!!
It's pathetic that alcohol is legal and cannabis illegal
We've never had a serious 'War on Drugs' in Canada. Our pathetic 'justice' system is a major part of the problem.
fail. the sooner they realize tat the better. sure drugs hurt people but if they're stupid enough to get caught up in it they deserve it. The drug war is just another government scam to waste our money, incrementally remove our freedoms and control us even more. For anybody interested on this topic, you must see this very well done documentary: American Drug War: The Last White Hope http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-82316348...
Sandra Calvani cannot tell the difference between her ass and elbow.
Sandra Calvani is apparently working for UNODC. UNODCs reports are well-known for their lack of methodological rigour and political bias. So do not expect much from that UN agency, perceived as corrupt and accused of protecting corrupt staff in several occasions.
The thing that prohibitionists don't seem to get is that legalization does not mean a free-for-all. Weed could be treated like alcohol and nicotine, but the harder stuff would be more tightly regulated, with offers of education and addiction treatment wherever you went to get your meth or coke or heroin. Nicotine is completely legal but its use is dropping thanks to money being put in to education and taxation. It was a hell of a lot easier to get any drug than it was to get alcohol before I was 19. Drug dealers do not ask for an ID. We've tried the justice system, it does not work to curb drug use or supply, in fact it's been the diametric opposite of success. Let's get some health and reason based approaches to the drug war. Also, if anyone tells you that any drug, heroin and meth included, is worse than alcohol, they are an idiot or a liar. Alcohol does not just affect the person who takes it, the way meth or heroin do. Alcohol is a socially accepted date rape drug, vehicular manslaughter enabler, and cause of many bad decisions. Its repercussions are enormous. Illegal drugs are not going away, let's take control of them rather than leave them in the hands of cold-blooded killers. If there's any one reason to end prohibition, it's looking back at the 20s and early 30s and the societal damage of Capone and his ilk. These gangs and cartels are just modern versions. One more reason for legalization: personal liberty. Our country was founded on that principle, just like our neighbour to the south. My morality is not your morality, which is a reason not to legislate it.
Sandro Calvani is apparently working for UNODC in Bogota. UNODCs reports are well-known for their lack of methodological rigour and political bias. So do not expect much from that UN agency, perceived as corrupt and accused of protecting corrupt staff in several occasions.
By posting your comment you agree to the Macleans.ca terms of service and privacy policy.
To add an avatar to your comment, please visit gravatar.com and register the email you use to comment on this site.
Comment
Read Full Article »