In 1983, the issue was whether the NATO alliance would proceed with its agreed plan to deploy hundreds of Pershing II ballistic missiles and Ground-Launched Cruise Missiles in five Western European nations (collectively known as Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces or INF). The allies had decided such deployments were necessary in the face of the Soviets' massive deployment of their own INF missiles, which the West called SS-20s -- formidable weapons armed with three nuclear warheads intended to intimidate and dominate Western Europe.
By 1983, the Kremlin made the defeat of this plan its top priority. The KGB mobilized massive demonstrations aimed at preventing the basing counties from proceeding with the associated construction and ultimately with the installation of the missiles. The Soviets employed both carrots and sticks -- seductive arms control negotiations and threats of Armageddon -- to divide the United States from its allies.
That gambit was made both more urgent and much more difficult for Soviet leader Mr. Andropov, who had long headed his nation's feared intelligence service and secret police, because of a decisive Reagan victory in the course of the previous year. The American president had adamantly opposed construction of a massive new Siberian gas pipeline on the grounds it would clearly have made Western Europe dependent upon Soviet energy -- and, therefore, susceptible to Moscow's blackmail.
Despite the determination of European leaders (including Mr. Reagan's friend Margaret Thatcher) to provide the funding and technology for the so-called second strand pipeline, Mr. Reagan ultimately prevailed.
Strong U.S. presidential leadership and the steadiness of the Defense Department (in which I was privileged to serve at the time) under the leadership of Mr. Reagan's Secretary of Defense Caspar W. Weinberger stymied Soviet attempts to divide and conquer. Even though the American State Department and its counterparts in the basing countries frantically sought an arms control deal that would prevent the INF deployment while leaving in place some number of SS-20s, Mr. Reagan insisted on "the zero option": Unless the Soviets agreed verifiably to eliminate all of the latter, NATO would proceed to put in place its off-setting deterrent forces.
The Soviets ultimately agreed to the zero option -- but only after the allies demonstrated they would not be dissuaded, divided or defeated. The rest, as they say, is history. Mikhail Gorbachev came to power unable to counter or contend with the Reagan strategy for destroying the Soviet Union (laid out in several presidential decision documents). Mr. Gorbachev proceeded to try to make adjustments, both at home and abroad, to keep the Soviet Union a going concern. Fortunately, in the end, the Evil Empire and even the Soviet Union itself come a cropper.
Flash forward to today. The NATO allies have again agreed to provide for their collective defense, this time by deploying not hundreds of nuclear-armed missiles but a radar and 10 unarmed anti-missile interceptors in the Czech Republic and Poland, respectively. This initiative has been made necessary and is sized minimally to contend with the emerging Iranian missile threat to Europe and the United States.
This time, however, Mr. Andropov's successor as the de facto master of the Kremlin, former KGB thug-turned president/prime minister Mr. Putin, thinks he will be able to prevail over the Atlantic Alliance where his former boss did not.
And with good reason. The United States is now led by a president who is -- to put it charitably -- no Ronald Reagan. President Obama and his administration have been determined to "reset" relations with Moscow. Toward that end, they have (among numerous other concessions) signaled a willingness to cashier the deployment in Eastern Europe of missile defenses that the Russians claim, preposterously, to find threatening.
In fact, the New York Times reported on Saturday that Team Obama is poised to look at alternatives -- sea-based missile defenses or putting those or other anti-missile systems ashore someplace other than Poland and the Czech Republic. Among the candidates said to be under consideration are Turkey, the Balkans or Israel. Never mind that these alternatives pose their own problems, including security, stability and geographic appropriateness given the trajectories of missiles Iran might launch.
The Polish and Czech governments are understandably horrified at this transparent bid to accede to the Kremlin's efforts to re-establish a sphere of influence in Europe. Other Europeans (notably, the Germans) are now heavily dependent on Russian-supplied natural gas -- another dramatic reversal of Mr. Reagan's time-tested policies. These countries therefore are subject to oft-practiced Moscow's energy blackmail and are happy to join Washington in appeasing Mr. Putin.
If the United States indeed goes that route, it will amount to much more than a strategically costly "do-over" of the INF fight. It will make plain to all the emerging "Obama Doctrine" with its three ominous characteristics: abandoning our allies, emboldening our enemies and diminishing our country.
The upshot, in sharp contrast to the Reagan legacy of pursuing peace through strength, will assuredly be a far more dangerous world.
Frank J. Gaffney Jr. is president of the Center for Security Policy, a columnist for The Washington Times and the host of the nationally syndicated program "Secure Freedom Radio" on WTNT 570 in Washington.
CommentsRead CommentsPost your comment:Please login or register to post a comment window.dctile = Number(window.dctile) + 1 || 1; window.ord = Number(window.ord) || Math.floor(Math.random() * 1E10); if(typeof(dcopt) == "undefined"){var dcopt = ";dcopt=ist"} else {var dcopt = ""} var size="300x250,300x600"; var type="story"; var site="wash.times"; var zone="opinion_commentary"; var pos="bottom"; if (17>dctile) document.write('n'); function yedda_render_widget(url) { var ct=''; var temp = document.getElementsByTagName('title'); if (temp!=null && temp.length>0) {ct=temp[0].text;} document.write(''); } yedda_render_widget("http://yedda.com/api/widgets/?d=517&mt=4&mt.qht=Putin's arms 'do-over'"); Got a question? Ask on Yedda! document.getElementById('yeddaAskBox').setAttribute('target','_blank')
Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?
Advertisement window.dctile = Number(window.dctile) + 1 || 1; window.ord = Number(window.ord) || Math.floor(Math.random() * 1E10); if(typeof(dcopt) == "undefined"){var dcopt = ";dcopt=ist"} else {var dcopt = ""} var size="300x250,300x600"; var type="story"; var site="wash.times"; var zone="opinion_commentary"; var pos="top"; if (17>dctile) document.write('n'); Top StoriesMost ReadBREITBART: End to two grim fairy talesObama faces growing anger on the leftEDITORIAL: False reports about gunsVoight: Is Obama creating a civil war in America? EXCLUSIVE: Obama's lobbyist curbs are political, watchdog toldEXCLUSIVE: Lack of translators hurts U.S. war on terrorBipartisan plan would end ACORN electioneeringThe forgotten womanEXCLUSIVE: Gonzales defends Holder's decision on CIAMarijuana found in another national parkMost SharedEvangelicals prepare gender neutral BibleS.C. Gov. Sanford says God on his sideEDITORIAL: False reports about gunsObama not smooth on GdanskEDITORIAL: Rangel profits by any way, any meansBREITBART: End to two grim fairy talesEXCLUSIVE: Obama's lobbyist curbs are political, watchdog toldMcDonnell lead halved after '89 thesis surfacedObama hosts Ramadan dinner at White HouseHoyer shouted down at town hallMost CommentedJeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behindWH communications director leavingFreddie Mac acting CFO found deadKerry aims to rescue newspapersFidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' wordsPresident Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm saidPolitics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker SeriesFleecing Mike DitkaRelated StoriesKarzai asks NATO to explain civilian deathsDEVINE: Clear the confusion, then rebuild movementEXCLUSIVE: Gonzales supports Holder on CIA probeObama not smooth on GdanskJapan leader says he's not anti-AmericanWalking the walkEmbassy RowFeds steady housing market, perhaps permanentlyEmbassy RowBOOKS: "In Afghanistan"PollThe White House announced Thursday the 'cash for clunkers' program may be suspended amid concerns it is running out of money. Should officials push to keep the program running?YesNoUndecidedOtherMarket Data SetC2LVisibility('WashingtonTimes','WashingtonTimes','news_2009_sep_02_putins-arms-do-over','C2LContainer','C2LContainer2'); Advertising LinksTWT Storee-editionPrint EditionWeekly Washington TimesTWT AffiliatesMiddle East TimesGolfUPIArbor BallroomWashington Times GlobalAbout TWTPress RoomF.A.Q.Work for TWTAdvertiseSponsorsContact UsPrivacy PolicySite Map
All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.
// Tacoda Audience Network var tcdacmd="dt"; var tcdasource='"; document.write(tcdasource); var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try{ var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3328123-2"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} // Quantcast tag _qoptions={ qacct:"p-c69_1G6fdlihY" };
Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?
All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.
Read Full Article »