I remember in the 1980s as a callow teenager meeting the great French political scientist Raymond Aron. He talked to me about the danger in politics of “benign neglect” – good intentions being obviated by lack of focus. That is the danger we face today on climate change.In less than three months at the UN summit in Copenhagen, decisions will be taken that determine the future of the planet. But a deal in Copenhagen is in danger; and the greatest danger of all is that amidst the competing priorities of economic recovery, Afghanistan and nuclear non-proliferation we fail to see the problem until it is too late. To tip the balance, the UK government this week began a new diplomatic push with European colleagues from France, Finland, Denmark and Sweden. We are working on four fronts.
First, climate change needs to be taken out of the “environment” box. A deal is not just desirable, but an imperative for national security and sustained economic recovery over the medium term, on a par with the fight against terrorism. High oil and food prices were a trigger for the current economic crisis, building up global financial imbalances and pushing up interest rates. The resource crunch is the second parent of the crisis alongside the credit crunch. Climate change will result in mass migration, drought, and water shortages causing tension and conflict within and between nations. Global warming may not be on the UN Security Council Agenda now, but it will be in future if we do not wean ourselves off carbon.
Second, we need a deal that passes a simple test: whether it is consistent with living in a world where temperatures rise by no more than two degrees. Most diplomatic negotiations involve compromise. This will be no different. But the one area we should not trade off is the level of ambition in a Copenhagen deal. Climate change is a non-linear phenomenon. Beyond two degrees and scientists warn us that the effects on the planet could be catastrophic. Worse still, there is a sharply increased risk�they will create vicious cycles that cause runaway climate change, such as the melting of the permafrost.
document.write('');
Third, the biggest blockage to a deal in Copenhagen is about finding a fair distribution of responsibility between developing and developed nations. The rich world bears historical responsibility for the problem and has much higher per-capita current emissions. But the developing world will be responsible for the majority of emissions growth in the future, and will suffer the greatest costs from climate change. The way through this is clear, but challenging to achieve. The developed world needs to make ambitious cuts in its emissions equivalent to 25 to 40 per cent by 2020. It needs to provide the finance and technology to enable poorer countries to develop low-carbon energy, and adapt to the climate change already in train. In return, poorer countries cannot be expected, at current levels of development, to cut overall levels of emissions; but they must make commitments to make verifiable shifts in their emissions profile from�the�business-as- usual of high carbon growth.
Fourth, we need a shift in tactics. Climate change is not a zero-sum game and we should not adopt zero-sum tactics. If we wait until the negotiations in Copenhagen to reveal our hand in order to squeeze the best deal out of other countries, the deal will either not happen or be insufficiently ambitious. If poor countries know that rich countries are prepared to shoulder responsibility, I believe they will step up to the mark. We need to generate trust and momentum in the run-up to Copenhagen. That is the significance of the decision of the new Japanese government to move from an 8 per cent reduction in emissions by 2020 on 1990 levels to a 25 per cent�reduction. We need more game-changing interventions in the next three months. As the UK prime minister has argued, we need to generate a finance offer – US $100 billion dollars annually�by 2020 – to poorer countries to enable them to begin the transition to low-carbon development and adaptation.
The UK is determined to show leadership on this issue. We are the first country to set a legally binding target to cut emissions by 34 per cent by 2020 on 1990 levels towards an 80 per cent cut by 2050. But the UK can have more impact as part of an EU
Comment
US ready to enter talks with Iran
Read the newspaper as it was printed
Send us your stories and pictures
document.write(''); The fight against climate change begins on four fronts
David Miliband
Last Updated: September 12. 2009 9:47PM UAE / September 12. 2009 5:47PM GMT
I remember in the 1980s as a callow teenager meeting the great French political scientist Raymond Aron. He talked to me about the danger in politics of “benign neglect” – good intentions being obviated by lack of focus. That is the danger we face today on climate change.In less than three months at the UN summit in Copenhagen, decisions will be taken that determine the future of the planet. But a deal in Copenhagen is in danger; and the greatest danger of all is that amidst the competing priorities of economic recovery, Afghanistan and nuclear non-proliferation we fail to see the problem until it is too late. To tip the balance, the UK government this week began a new diplomatic push with European colleagues from France, Finland, Denmark and Sweden. We are working on four fronts.
First, climate change needs to be taken out of the “environment” box. A deal is not just desirable, but an imperative for national security and sustained economic recovery over the medium term, on a par with the fight against terrorism. High oil and food prices were a trigger for the current economic crisis, building up global financial imbalances and pushing up interest rates. The resource crunch is the second parent of the crisis alongside the credit crunch. Climate change will result in mass migration, drought, and water shortages causing tension and conflict within and between nations. Global warming may not be on the UN Security Council Agenda now, but it will be in future if we do not wean ourselves off carbon.
Second, we need a deal that passes a simple test: whether it is consistent with living in a world where temperatures rise by no more than two degrees. Most diplomatic negotiations involve compromise. This will be no different. But the one area we should not trade off is the level of ambition in a Copenhagen deal. Climate change is a non-linear phenomenon. Beyond two degrees and scientists warn us that the effects on the planet could be catastrophic. Worse still, there is a sharply increased risk�they will create vicious cycles that cause runaway climate change, such as the melting of the permafrost.
document.write('');
Third, the biggest blockage to a deal in Copenhagen is about finding a fair distribution of responsibility between developing and developed nations. The rich world bears historical responsibility for the problem and has much higher per-capita current emissions. But the developing world will be responsible for the majority of emissions growth in the future, and will suffer the greatest costs from climate change. The way through this is clear, but challenging to achieve. The developed world needs to make ambitious cuts in its emissions equivalent to 25 to 40 per cent by 2020. It needs to provide the finance and technology to enable poorer countries to develop low-carbon energy, and adapt to the climate change already in train. In return, poorer countries cannot be expected, at current levels of development, to cut overall levels of emissions; but they must make commitments to make verifiable shifts in their emissions profile from�the�business-as- usual of high carbon growth.
Fourth, we need a shift in tactics. Climate change is not a zero-sum game and we should not adopt zero-sum tactics. If we wait until the negotiations in Copenhagen to reveal our hand in order to squeeze the best deal out of other countries, the deal will either not happen or be insufficiently ambitious. If poor countries know that rich countries are prepared to shoulder responsibility, I believe they will step up to the mark. We need to generate trust and momentum in the run-up to Copenhagen. That is the significance of the decision of the new Japanese government to move from an 8 per cent reduction in emissions by 2020 on 1990 levels to a 25 per cent�reduction. We need more game-changing interventions in the next three months. As the UK prime minister has argued, we need to generate a finance offer – US $100 billion dollars annually�by 2020 – to poorer countries to enable them to begin the transition to low-carbon development and adaptation.
The UK is determined to show leadership on this issue. We are the first country to set a legally binding target to cut emissions by 34 per cent by 2020 on 1990 levels towards an 80 per cent cut by 2050. But the UK can have more impact as part of an EU mobilisation. The EU has the world's first carbon market that transfers funds to poorer countries where emissions reductions are most cost-effective. The EU is the biggest single market in the world. When it sets standards for cars or fridges it has the power to drive innovation. The EU is the second biggest aid donor in the world – when it puts together a climate finance package, it can leverage action from developing countries. And the EU has six major summits coming up between now and December with all the other big players. Climate change needs to be the centrepiece of those summits. And the EU thrives on big projects: peace and reconciliation after the�Second�World�War, the single market, the euro and enlargement. The next big project for the EU – the environmental union – is to be the catalyst for a world beyond carbon.
Climate change involves science, economics and technology. But now a deal depends on politics. We need a fresh approach, and we need it soon.David Miliband is the British secretary of state for foreign and commonwealth affairs and member of parliament for South Shields.
Send to friend Print Comments (0) var addthis_pub="noahkhan"; var addthis_brand = "The National"; var addthis_logo = "http://www.thenational.ae/images/the_national_logo.gif"; var addthis_logo_color = "3261A5"; Bookmark & Share function storeCaret(textEl) { if (textEl.createTextRange) textEl.caretPos = document.selection.createRange().duplicate(); } if ((document.all) && (navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Opera')== -1)) { IE = true; } else { IE = false; } function doSubmitMessage(aFormId,aUrl){ aForumForm = aFormId; aCreateUrl = aUrl+"&omniture=0"; aForumMessageUrl = ''; aAjaxDiv = document.getElementById("cpost"); processForum(aAjaxDiv); }
Have your say
Please log in to post a comment try { if (document.getElementById("_userEmail").innerHTML = '') { document.newmessageform.Body.disabled=true; document.newmessageform.post.disabled = true; } } catch(e) { document.newmessageform.Body.disabled = true; document.newmessageform.post.disabled = true; } Other Opinion stories Counter al Qa'eda with a new strategy Israel's economic war against the Gaza Strip Costs and benefits can't be ignored in finding a solution The fight against climate change begins on four fronts Hariri resigns, puts pressure on Hizbollah When the ice age ended, how did the polar bears feel? document.write(''); Top stories 110,000 ride Metro in first two days Text to tyre shop worker: 'You're now a millionaire' RTA campaign to educate commuters Murder victim's lawyer reported stalker Washington agrees to talks with Tehran Cairo publisher finds model for Arabic e-books Live blog: Italian Grand Prix Your View Where have you seen the strongest evidence of climate change?How have you been affected by the power cuts in the northern emirates?Have you experienced problems with customer service in the UAE?Do you worry about your child's safety on school buses?What do you do to save water? Most popular stories Most read Most e-mailed Text to tyre shop worker: 'You're now a millionaire' 110,000 ride Metro in first two days Murder victim's lawyer reported stalker RTA campaign to educate commuters The great Metro race Interactive: All about the Dubai Metro An invention to save children Washington agrees to talks with Tehran Metro wobbly in weekend debut Disputes to treble over pay claims Abandoned, the dream cars of Dubai Israel gets tough on intermarriage Interactive: All about the Dubai Metro New car value halves once it is driven World Bank expects recession to deepen Metro wobbly in weekend debut Past, present, future Dubai Metro launches tonight Abu Dhabi's artistic muscle Searching the internet the halal way var countries=new ddtabcontent("countrytabs") countries.setpersist(true) countries.setselectedClassTarget("link") //"link" or "linkparent" countries.init() Products & Services Your View e-polls e-Paper RSS Feeds Home var countries=new ddtabcontent("countrytabs") countries.setpersist(true) countries.setselectedClassTarget("link") //"link" or "linkparent" countries.init() Products & Services Your View e-polls e-Paper RSS Feeds Home UAE World Business Sport About us Contact us Terms & Conditions FAQ Site map
© Copyright of Abu Dhabi Media Company PJSC.
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-4452332-2"); pageTracker._initData(); pageTracker._trackPageview(); //-1?'https:':'http:') +unescape('//me.effectivemeasure.net/em.js%22%3E%3C/script%3E')); //]]> var doLoad = true; if (doLoad) { updatePollMini(); } s.Account="saxotechthenational" s.cookieDomainPeriods="2" s.pageName="Opinion,The fight against climate change begins on four fronts:20090913:709129942" s.server="S260608AT1VW923" s.channel="Opinion" /* Traffic Variables */ s.prop1="Story" /* E-commerce Variables */ /* Hierarchy Variables */ s.hier1="Opinion,The fight against climate change begins on four fronts:20090913:709129942" /************* DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! **************/ var s_code=s.t(); if(s_code)document.write(s_code)
Read Full Article »