This week, President Barack Obama reaffirmed the commitment of the United States to our core goal: to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and prevent their return to either country. The US is sending an additional 30,000 personnel to Afghanistan, significantly increasing our civilian aid to the Afghan people, and broadening our partnership with Pakistan.
Today in Brussels, I will discuss the way forward with our allies. And I will thank those nations that have pledged additional troops. This is a crucial test for Nato. After September 11, the alliance invoked Article 5 of its charter for the first time, affirming that the terrorist attacks planned in Afghanistan and perpetrated in the US were attacks on every Nato member. The members of the alliance have paid a steep price in lives, but we must remain firm in our resolve.
For countries in the region, the stakes are particularly high. Civilians of every faith have been murdered, but Muslims have paid the highest toll. Troops from Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and other Muslim-majority nations are fighting extremism in Afghanistan and their participation is vital to our mission.
Along with the extra American troops, more international forces will help to deny al-Qaeda a safe haven; reverse the Taliban’s momentum and deny it the ability to overthrow the government; and strengthen the capacity of the Afghans to take responsibility for their own security.
President Obama has outlined a time frame for transition to Afghan responsibility, with the additional troops allowing us to accelerate handing over security to Afghan forces, beginning in July 2011. Just as we have done in Iraq, we will execute this transition responsibly, taking into account conditions on the ground.
Our approach signals both the urgency and resolve that this mission requires. Our urgency is reflected in the time frame for transition that asks the Afghan government to start taking full ownership of security. Our resolve is reflected in the substantial deployment of troops since the President took office; in our commitment to assist Afghan forces for the long haul; and in the significant civilian commitment that will continue long after our forces leave.
It should be clear to everyone that we will not repeat the mistakes of the past. The US and our partners will have an enduring commitment to the region. Ultimately, we recognise that only the Afghan people can decide what kind of nation they want to build for themselves. And only the Pakistani people can ensure their country’s democratic future.
By Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State Published: 1:06AM GMT 04 Dec 2009
Comments 5 | Comment on this article
This week, President Barack Obama reaffirmed the commitment of the United States to our core goal: to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and prevent their return to either country. The US is sending an additional 30,000 personnel to Afghanistan, significantly increasing our civilian aid to the Afghan people, and broadening our partnership with Pakistan.
Today in Brussels, I will discuss the way forward with our allies. And I will thank those nations that have pledged additional troops. This is a crucial test for Nato. After September 11, the alliance invoked Article 5 of its charter for the first time, affirming that the terrorist attacks planned in Afghanistan and perpetrated in the US were attacks on every Nato member. The members of the alliance have paid a steep price in lives, but we must remain firm in our resolve.
For countries in the region, the stakes are particularly high. Civilians of every faith have been murdered, but Muslims have paid the highest toll. Troops from Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and other Muslim-majority nations are fighting extremism in Afghanistan and their participation is vital to our mission.
Along with the extra American troops, more international forces will help to deny al-Qaeda a safe haven; reverse the Taliban’s momentum and deny it the ability to overthrow the government; and strengthen the capacity of the Afghans to take responsibility for their own security.
President Obama has outlined a time frame for transition to Afghan responsibility, with the additional troops allowing us to accelerate handing over security to Afghan forces, beginning in July 2011. Just as we have done in Iraq, we will execute this transition responsibly, taking into account conditions on the ground.
Our approach signals both the urgency and resolve that this mission requires. Our urgency is reflected in the time frame for transition that asks the Afghan government to start taking full ownership of security. Our resolve is reflected in the substantial deployment of troops since the President took office; in our commitment to assist Afghan forces for the long haul; and in the significant civilian commitment that will continue long after our forces leave.
It should be clear to everyone that we will not repeat the mistakes of the past. The US and our partners will have an enduring commitment to the region. Ultimately, we recognise that only the Afghan people can decide what kind of nation they want to build for themselves. And only the Pakistani people can ensure their country’s democratic future. That is why we are working as partners in both countries. The United States has no interest in occupation — we seek partnerships based on mutual respect, mutual interest and mutual trust.
As the President said, our goal is to isolate those who destroy, to strengthen those who build, to hasten the day when our troops will leave, and to forge lasting friendships in which America is a partner, and never a patron.
For the US, for Nato, for Muslim communities, for peace-loving people around the world, and most of all for the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan, this is a war that must be won. We will do our part. And so must the world.
Comments: 5
To follow on. I do not believe the case is made for us to be in Afghanistan. On the contrary, denying terrorist a safe haven can be achieved by showing Afghanistan and Taliban particularly that this has serious consequences for them. Without sending in troops.
Questions: Why are we trying to make Afghanistan a pale immitation of the West? They are happy to live in the 13th Century. Let them. If they wish to give safe haven then pick the villages and flatten them from the air. Totally. They will get the message not to mess with the West and we can pull ALL our troops out immediately and leave them to live their lives the way they want too.
Agree ,it relates to the west,they like the americans to protect they backsides when the chips are down,These our the countries that formed NATO,and slept comfortably ,now when the going gets a bit rough,they nowhere to be seen ,well token gestures.If i was american ,i would pull out of the west,and let these prats get on with they own security,just nuke any other prats who interfer with thier lives,and form more trustworthy alliances.
The only sensible option for U.S now is to retreat from Afganistan and most of all to learn from past mistakes.
The best way all nations could play a part in Afghanistan is to persuade the USA to change its policy and withdraw. If that means withdrawing themselves and leaving the USA alone then so be it. The Russians tried to subdue Afghanistan for years and failed - the USA will fare no better
Post a comment
By submitting any material to us you confirm that you have read, and agree to, our terms and conditions
Your name *
Your email address *
Your Comment *
* = Required information
China news
India news
Pakistan news
Afghanistan news
Read Full Article »