U.S. May Lose Control of Peace Process

U.S. May Lose Control of Peace Process

 

'This is how the international community should work," said President Barack Obama a little more than a week ago. "More nations, not just the United States, bearing the responsibility and cost of upholding peace and security." He was referring to the military campaign in Libya, in which the US insisted it was simply following the lead of the Europeans and the Arab League, and quickly handed off command of the operation to Nato and a multilateral consensus. But some of Washington's most trusted partners believe the same principle should apply to the search for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Britain, France and Germany are pressing to take the "Middle East Peace Process" file out of the White House, where it has gathered dust for the past decade. If they succeed, they might be doing Mr Obama a favour because domestic politics in the US essentially prevent him from doing what he knows needs to be done to forge a two-state solution.

Washington will, however, face even more pushback from Israel following a Washington Post article by Judge Richard Goldstone, softening the charges in his UN report accusing Israel of war crimes in 2008. Mr Goldstone wrote that subsequent investigations suggest there was no evidence Israeli forces had deliberately targeted civilians. While not necessarily vindicating Israel's conduct, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has seized on the partial retraction to demand that the UN bury the report. The affair will now become Exhibit A in Israel's efforts to resist foreign pressure by claiming the affair proves an anti-Israel bias in international institutions.

 

//

 

Domestic political calculations last month forced the administration to veto a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate halt to Israeli settlement construction on land conquered in 1967. But that veto, which isolated Washington from all of its allies except Israel, was also a moment of clarity: if domestic political calculations require that the US veto a Security Council resolution echoing its own policy on settlements, what hope was there for Washington to broker a just and viable solution to the conflict?

The administration's key European allies are now urging that the April 15 meeting of the Mideast Quartet formally state the international consensus that the geographic basis for a two-state solution is Israel's boundaries before the June 1967 war. By recognising Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem as the basis of a Palestinian state, the Quartet would be affirming that any territory Israel occupies outside of its 1967 borders is the Palestinians' (and in the case of the Golan Heights, Syria's) to trade away as they see fit, rather than Israel's to "concede".

 

 

Israel, which has settled almost a half million of its citizens on Occupied Territories, is fighting hard to avoid such international recognition of Palestinian claims. But when the UN General Assembly meets in September, the Palestinian leadership plans to demand that an independent Palestine based on the 1967 lines be recognised as a member state. There are no vetoes in the Assembly, and the Palestinians will easily muster the simple majority of the world's nations required to pass such a resolution.

No amount of diplomatic consensus can change the fact that Israel holds those territories, but it will affirm that it holds them by force of arms rather than on the basis of any legal recognition. And that undercuts the Israelis' expectation that their overwhelming advantage in the balance of force with the Palestinians, and the favour they enjoy in US domestic politics, will somehow compel the Palestinians - and with Washington's imprimatur, the wider world - to accept Israel's terms.

Mr Obama had prioritised settling the conflict, and had pressed Israel to halt all settlement construction to demonstrate that it was sincere about ending the occupation. But Israel is in no hurry to end the occupation, nor does it suffer any serious consequences for maintaining it. So Mr Netanyahu relied on Israel's unconditional support on Capitol Hill -and among some important Democratic Party campaign donors - to defy Mr Obama, and the president is not going to risk his re-election chances in a showdown with Israel. Next page

Share this article: Pages: 1 2 One-page article

Back to the top

More articles Back to The National Conversation Previous article

The Marina Mall Street Festival is a rousing success

var htmldata = ""; function addHtmlToThisDiv() { $.get("/portal/site/thenational/template.ASYNC/menuitem.051b64b1e928c042a6dfd610359c71ca/?javax.portlet.tpst=f9741bd01a02b7d2406d2910359c71ca&javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&vgnextoid=f6d00cab3cb1f210VgnVCM100000e56411acRCRD", function(data) { $('#add_comments_block').html(data); //the comment input box is hidded from non logged users if(!isUserLogged && $(".your-comment") ){ $(".your-comment").hide(); }else{ $(".your-comment").show();; } } ); } var isUserLogged = false; /** * This function disables the comments if the user is not logged in. */ function testIfUserLogged() { $.get("/portal/site/thenational/template.header/?requestType=signin&vgn-ppReq=true", function (r) { var mydiv = document.createElement("div") if(r) { mydiv.innerHTML = r; if (mydiv.getElementsByTagName("li")) { var d = mydiv.getElementsByTagName("li")[0].innerHTML; isUserLogged = isLogged(d); } } addHtmlToThisDiv(); } ); return ''; } function isLogged(d) { var num = d.indexOf("Register"); return !(num != -1); } testIfUserLogged(); Related Information Comment Related Searches A stable Yemen is not a pie-in-the-sky proposition Lebanon: stuck at the starting gate Down's syndrome children need special education Related Topics United Nations Israel Palestinian Territories var id ='The National Conversation'; if(id!='News'){ if(document.getElementById(id)!=null){ document.getElementById(id).setAttribute("class", "current"); document.getElementById(id).setAttribute("className", "current"); if (navigator.appName == "Microsoft Internet Explorer") { document.getElementById(id).className='current'; }else { document.getElementById(id).setAttribute("class", "current"); } } }else { if(document.getElementById(id)!=null){ //document.getElementById(id).className='current first-child'; document.getElementById(id).setAttribute("class", "current first-child"); document.getElementById(id).setAttribute("className", "current first-child"); if (navigator.appName == "Microsoft Internet Explorer") { document.getElementById(id).className='current first-child'; }else { document.getElementById(id).setAttribute("class", "current first-child"); } } } var dcs_articleName = "Obama's retreat leaves Israel at the mercy of multilateralism"; var dcs_classifications = "/thenational/Organisations/United Nations,/thenational/Location/Middle East/Israel,/thenational/Location/Middle East/Palestinian Territories,/thenational/People/Leaders and politicians/Barack Obama"; f6d00cab3cb1f210VgnVCM100000e56411acRCRD The National Conversation Summary

The United States invoked international principles to justify intervention in Libya. If those same principles are applied to the Middle East peace process, Israel will find itself held to a stricter standard than its patrons in Washington might wish.

Share this article:

Save this article

Your opinion Poll Results Your opinion Do you believe there is a lack of parking in the capital? Yes No

View results or

function parsePollResults(pollResults) { var outputData = ""; var totalVotes = 0; var remainderValue = 0; var j = 0; var pollResultLength = pollResults.childNodes.length; outputData +="Poll Results"; outputData +=""; for (var i = 0; i next photo previous photo // Get the most from Sign up to our newsletter Most Viewed Most Commented Most Viewed Tip your hat to Anil Kumble for hand in India World Cup triumph It will be hard for Sangakkara's Sri Lanka to stay at the top Obama's retreat leaves Israel at the mercy of multilateralism Pakistan reaches out to India, but will we see a cricket tour soon? Singh changes the pitch with Pakistan by cricket diplomacy Most Commented Modesty is a forgotten virtue on our nation's campuses Egypt and Israel's armies will only grow more powerful Tottenham coach Joe Jordan wrong to rile Gennaro Gattuso Lebanon's exile politics put stability and justice at risk Some referees are robots function nullSrc() { return ''; } var theBuffer; function exchangerInit() { theBuffer= new exchanger("hiddenframe"); } function sendDataToServer(data) { theBuffer.sendData("/portal/site/thenational/template.PAGE/action.process/menuitem.051b64b1e928c042a6dfd610359c71ca/?action=process_dhtml&"+data); } function showReturnData() { alert(theBuffer.retrieveData("myNewData")); } Sections The National Conversation Comment Analysis Editorial Feedback Discussion Our journalists Sound & Vision Pictures Videos Audio Inside the National The Guide Practical Information Social Information History Events Upcoming Events My events Online Features E-Paper Competitions From The Paper The Review M Magazine Weekender My National Edit preferences Manage alerts

Do you have a story?

On the site: NewsUAE newsCourtsEducationEnvironmentHealthPoliticsScienceTechnologyTourismTransportWorldwideMiddle EastSouth AsiaAmericasEuropeAsia PacificAfricaBusinessIndustry InsightsAviationBankingEconomyEnergyMarketsMediaPropertyRetailTechnologyTelecomsTravel & tourismSportUAE sportFootballFormula OneCricketGolfHorse racingTennisRugbyMotorsportNorth American sportOther sportLifestyleMotoringTravelHouse & homePersonal financeFashionFoodWell beingFamilyMagazineArts & CultureArtBooksFilmMusicOn stageThe Review Can't find what you are looking for? Try The National Topics About us Contact us Work for us Privacy policy Terms and conditions Advertise with us Subscribe Sitemap //-1?'https://me-ssl':'http://me-cdn')+unescape('.effectivemeasure.net/em.js%22%3E%3C/script%3E')); //]]> var pvar = { cid: "mena-admedia", content: "0", sample_size: 10, server: "secure-uk" }; var feat = { surveys_enabled: 1 }; var trac = nol_t(pvar, feat); var _rsND = trac.getSchemeHost(); var _rsCI = "mena-admedia"; trac.record().post().do_sample(); //> //> var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-18693758-1']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); var _sf_async_config={uid:2876,domain:'thenational.ae'};(function(){function loadPublishflow() {window._sf_endpt=(new Date()).getTime();var e = document.createElement('script');e.setAttribute('language', 'javascript');e.setAttribute('type', 'text/javascript');e.setAttribute('src',(('https:' == document.location.protocol) ? 'https://s3.amazonaws.com/' : 'http://s3.amazonaws.com/') + 'publishflow/javascript/data.js');document.body.appendChild(e);} var oldonload = window.onload;window.onload = (typeof window.onload != 'function') ?loadPublishflow : function() { oldonload(); loadPublishflow(); };})();

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2011

 

'This is how the international community should work," said President Barack Obama a little more than a week ago. "More nations, not just the United States, bearing the responsibility and cost of upholding peace and security." He was referring to the military campaign in Libya, in which the US insisted it was simply following the lead of the Europeans and the Arab League, and quickly handed off command of the operation to Nato and a multilateral consensus. But some of Washington's most trusted partners believe the same principle should apply to the search for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Britain, France and Germany are pressing to take the "Middle East Peace Process" file out of the White House, where it has gathered dust for the past decade. If they succeed, they might be doing Mr Obama a favour because domestic politics in the US essentially prevent him from doing what he knows needs to be done to forge a two-state solution.

Washington will, however, face even more pushback from Israel following a Washington Post article by Judge Richard Goldstone, softening the charges in his UN report accusing Israel of war crimes in 2008. Mr Goldstone wrote that subsequent investigations suggest there was no evidence Israeli forces had deliberately targeted civilians. While not necessarily vindicating Israel's conduct, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has seized on the partial retraction to demand that the UN bury the report. The affair will now become Exhibit A in Israel's efforts to resist foreign pressure by claiming the affair proves an anti-Israel bias in international institutions.

 

Domestic political calculations last month forced the administration to veto a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate halt to Israeli settlement construction on land conquered in 1967. But that veto, which isolated Washington from all of its allies except Israel, was also a moment of clarity: if domestic political calculations require that the US veto a Security Council resolution echoing its own policy on settlements, what hope was there for Washington to broker a just and viable solution to the conflict?

The administration's key European allies are now urging that the April 15 meeting of the Mideast Quartet formally state the international consensus that the geographic basis for a two-state solution is Israel's boundaries before the June 1967 war. By recognising Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem as the basis of a Palestinian state, the Quartet would be affirming that any territory Israel occupies outside of its 1967 borders is the Palestinians' (and in the case of the Golan Heights, Syria's) to trade away as they see fit, rather than Israel's to "concede".

 

Israel, which has settled almost a half million of its citizens on Occupied Territories, is fighting hard to avoid such international recognition of Palestinian claims. But when the UN General Assembly meets in September, the Palestinian leadership plans to demand that an independent Palestine based on the 1967 lines be recognised as a member state. There are no vetoes in the Assembly, and the Palestinians will easily muster the simple majority of the world's nations required to pass such a resolution.

No amount of diplomatic consensus can change the fact that Israel holds those territories, but it will affirm that it holds them by force of arms rather than on the basis of any legal recognition. And that undercuts the Israelis' expectation that their overwhelming advantage in the balance of force with the Palestinians, and the favour they enjoy in US domestic politics, will somehow compel the Palestinians - and with Washington's imprimatur, the wider world - to accept Israel's terms.

Mr Obama had prioritised settling the conflict, and had pressed Israel to halt all settlement construction to demonstrate that it was sincere about ending the occupation. But Israel is in no hurry to end the occupation, nor does it suffer any serious consequences for maintaining it. So Mr Netanyahu relied on Israel's unconditional support on Capitol Hill -and among some important Democratic Party campaign donors - to defy Mr Obama, and the president is not going to risk his re-election chances in a showdown with Israel. Next page

Back to the top

The Marina Mall Street Festival is a rousing success

The United States invoked international principles to justify intervention in Libya. If those same principles are applied to the Middle East peace process, Israel will find itself held to a stricter standard than its patrons in Washington might wish.

Save this article

View results or

Ballet Gala at the Abu Dhabi Festival

Do you have a story?

Read Full Article »
Comment
Show commentsHide Comments

Related Articles