Iran’s Future Demands a Clean Break
AP
X
Story Stream
recent articles

Iran stands at a historic crossroads. After weeks of nationwide protests, the clerical regime has been shaken but not yet dislodged. Mass arrests, executions, and brutal repression have temporarily halted demonstrations, yet they have failed to silence a society that has fundamentally rejected dictatorship. Iran is approaching a decisive moment that requires a clear, realistic path toward a secular democratic republic rooted in the will of the people.

History offers a hard lesson. Regimes do not collapse because they are despised, isolated, or morally bankrupt. They fall when sustained popular resistance is matched by organized capacity inside the country. Courage alone is not enough. Overthrowing an entrenched and violent dictatorship requires a nationwide movement with structure, discipline, and the ability to confront repression on the ground.

The demands of Iran’s protesters are clear. They reject all forms of unaccountable rule whether clerical or hereditary and insist on popular sovereignty, free elections, and republican governance. Any credible vision for Iran’s future must therefore be grounded in democratic principles and political reality. A genuine transition to a democratic republic requires organized forces inside Iran that can mobilize society, sustain resistance, and prevent the power vacuums authoritarian systems exploit to survive.

For years, and most visibly during the recent uprising, this role has been carried out by organized resistance networks inside Iran led by the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran and its nationwide network of Resistance Units. Operating under surveillance and repression, these forces have coordinated acts of defiance and demonstrated that the regime’s grip on power is not permanent. Any serious roadmap toward a secular democratic republic in Iran must recognize that without an organized resistance force on the ground capable of challenging the regime’s instruments of repression, talk of transition is theoretical.

The foundation of Iran’s future republic must be the abolition of clerical rule and the separation of religion and state. A future Iranian republic must guarantee freedom of speech, assembly, the press, and unrestricted internet access so that citizens can participate in public life without fear. Individual and social freedoms must be protected in accordance with international human rights standards, and freedom of religion and belief must be guaranteed for all.

Gender equality must be absolute and non-negotiable. Women must participate fully in political leadership and enjoy equal rights in every sphere of life. Justice requires an independent judiciary and the abolition of the death penalty, replacing the rule of fear with the rule of law. Iran’s diverse ethnic and national communities must enjoy equal rights and meaningful autonomy within a unified democratic republic.

Economic opportunity must be open to all through a transparent, free-market system that rewards productivity and innovation rather than corruption and patronage. Environmental destruction, long ignored by the ruling elite, must be reversed through responsible governance. Finally, a future Iranian republic must renounce nuclear weapons and all weapons of mass destruction and commit itself to peace, regional stability, and international cooperation.

This vision is not abstract idealism. It is articulated in the Ten-Point Plan for Iran’s Future presented by Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of National Council of Resistance of Iran. It provides a credible framework for a transitional authority until free and fair elections can be held.

Despite this clarity, some external narratives continue to promote a return to monarchy under the son of the long-deposed Shah. This approach ignores both Iran’s recent history and the political realities revealed by the uprising. Hereditary rule, by definition, contradicts the principle of popular sovereignty repeatedly voiced by protesters. More importantly, symbolic figures without an organized presence, network, or capacity inside Iran cannot lead a genuine transition to a democratic republic. Regime change is not achieved through media visibility abroad, but through sustained resistance at home.

Iran’s future must not remain hostage to its past. The collapse of theocratic tyranny must not be followed by the recycling of authoritarian models under new labels. What Iran needs is a clean break: a secular democratic republic, born from the sacrifices of the Iranian people and institutionalized through free and fair elections.

A transitional government that is limited in scope and duration must guide the country through this passage and transfer power to elected representatives within months of the regime’s overthrow. Legitimacy must come from the ballot box, not inheritance, appointment, or external engineering. Through decades of resistance and sacrifice, Iran’s people have shown they are ready to build a free, democratic republic.

Tim Mehdi Ghaemi is chairman of Colorado’s Iranian American Community, the General Manager of Operations at Alborz Real Estate Co., and the Chairman of Colorado’s Middle Eastern American Meetup Group.